Added ServicePrincipalRiskLevels to ConditionalAccessConditionSet
#246
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
July 8, 2023 08:34
manicminer
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this @bubbletroubles. Although the servicePrincipalRiskLevels field doesn't support that value, it is still the same object so we should use the ConditionalAccessRiskLevel type. I'll go ahead and update this so we can merge in the additional field.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added
ServicePrincipalRiskLevelstoConditionalAccessConditionSetCreated a new value type for
ConditionalAccessServicePrincipalRiskLevelas Service Principles don't have thehiddenvalue which is currently inConditionalAccessRiskLevel- see Graph API v1.0 documentation