Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs: add marked-footnote to known extensions #3034

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023
Merged

docs: add marked-footnote to known extensions #3034

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

bent10
Copy link
Contributor

@bent10 bent10 commented Oct 10, 2023

Description

Add marked-footnote to known extensions

Contributor

  • Test(s) exist to ensure functionality and minimize regression (if no tests added, list tests covering this PR); or,
  • no tests required for this PR.
  • If submitting new feature, it has been documented in the appropriate places.

Committer

In most cases, this should be a different person than the contributor.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 10, 2023 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
marked-website ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 10, 2023 11:09am

UziTech
UziTech approved these changes Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@UziTech UziTech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is awesome! Thanks! 💯

@UziTech UziTech merged commit 3aa1742 into markedjs:master Oct 10, 2023
12 checks passed
@bent10 bent10 deleted the docs branch October 11, 2023 00:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@UziTech UziTech UziTech approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@bent10 @UziTech