Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for the exportmap flag #94

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2024

Conversation

mwalle
Copy link
Contributor

@mwalle mwalle commented Mar 1, 2024

This flag is esp. useful if you want to reimplement an existing package. E.g. you can use it to implement a missing javacardx.framework.tlv package.

This flag is esp. useful if you want to reimplement an existing package.
E.g. you can use it to implement a missing javacardx.framework.tlv
package.
@martinpaljak martinpaljak merged commit bbe0e56 into martinpaljak:next Mar 2, 2024
1 check passed
@martinpaljak
Copy link
Owner

Nice, thanks!

@martinpaljak
Copy link
Owner

If you could also make a very simple source test case (in spirit of EmptyApplet) would be great!

@mwalle
Copy link
Contributor Author

mwalle commented Mar 2, 2024

Sure I can look into reimplementing the test library. Is there a reason why the library aren't tested in tests-17.xml?

Apparently, there is only a simple single test. Seems like I need to get an older java version.

@martinpaljak
Copy link
Owner

#92 will probably see some improvements when it comes to libraries/export files and JDK-17 with latest JC kit. These ant snippets are more like smoke tests anyway, absence of which is just ... (you can guess).

@mwalle
Copy link
Contributor Author

mwalle commented Mar 2, 2024

I've added a small (positive only) test to, see #95.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants