CSS Visibility: Link target doesn't exist

[estelle]

MDN URL

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/visibility

What specific section or headline is this issue about?

animation type

What information was incorrect, unhelpful, or incomplete?

In the formal definition, the animation type value is a link to a target not addressed in the document: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/visibility#Interpolation

What did you expect to see?

a definition of the animation type somewhere

Do you have any supporting links, references, or citations?

https://www.w3.org/TR/css-display-3/#visibility

animation type is discrete.

Do you have anything more you want to share?

No response

MDN metadata

Page report details

• Folder: en-us/web/css/visibility
• MDN URL: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/visibility
• GitHub URL: https://github.com/mdn/content/blob/main/files/en-us/web/css/visibility/index.md
• Last commit: mdn/content@abcebf4
• Document last modified: 2022-05-17T13:23:31.000Z

[wbamberg]

The link target does exist: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/visibility#Interpolation ... but following the link in https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/visibility#formal_definition doesn't take you there. Is this a Yari thing?

[teoli2003]

I think the following is happening:

• all our anchors (link targets) are lowercase. When converting Markdown to HTML, Yari converts link targets to lowercase. (We still try to fix them in the source in mdn/content for cleanness reasons, but this is not really needed).
• Nevertheless, in this case, the link starts with a capital: it doesn't work
• The reason why Yari didn't fix it is that this HTML is generated by a macro, and not magically fixed by Yari.

So I think it is a bug in the macro.

[wbamberg]

Ah, you are right!

[wbamberg]

I guess actually it's coming from https://github.com/mdn/data/blob/ba61af61baf4f1ed4c41b4cf9654b7b381f0a4ae/l10n/css.json#L1677.

[teoli2003]

Oh yes, you nailed it.

[teoli2003]

I think we can close this.