Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct broken links via sphinx linkcheck builder #47

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 30, 2022
Merged

Conversation

AlpAribal
Copy link
Contributor

@AlpAribal AlpAribal commented Jun 29, 2022

Description

Ran the linkcheck builder to identify broken links. PR fixes such links along with a few typos.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactoring including code style reformatting
  • Other (please describe):

Checklist:

  • I have read the contributing guideline doc (external contributors only)
  • Lint and unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have kept the PR small so that it can be easily reviewed
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • All dependency changes have been reflected in the pip requirement files.

Copy link
Contributor

@winfried-ripken winfried-ripken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG, thanks!

@AlpAribal AlpAribal merged commit a055d99 into main Jun 30, 2022
@AlpAribal AlpAribal deleted the alp-linkcheck branch June 30, 2022 08:48
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 30, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants