-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support optional full flux input #50
Comments
@fsteeg and I discussed offline:
|
Further we decided that we will not implement special warnings if files are used in the flux, because when processing there will be a corresponding error message that this file can not be found. |
the server does not answer with a file, the result will be in the result field, same as using |
Deployed to https://test.metafacture.org/playground/ |
Greyed ares are good! And good development :) Some things I stumbled upon:
PS: for another ticket. FLUX editor suggests FIX commands, when I type "open-fil": |
Deployed to https://metafacture.org/playground/ |
As a first step, it should be possible to paste and run a Flux like this:
No fix, no reading or writing local files. This should be run as it is.
Next steps would be to run workflows with embedded fix (fill the fix in UI with embedded content?) or fix files (show warning and use fix from UI?), as well as writing to files (write to temp file as we currently do for the input?).
If the flux does not provide it's own input we'd like to retain the current behavior. To detect that might be a little tricky since flux files can start with variables. We could use something like
PG_DATA
to refer to the UI input data in the Playground, which could be detected/replaced when building the actual flux to run, e.g. for the current sample:Functional review: @TobiasNx
Code review: @fsteeg
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: