Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implicit object literal as right operand of all binary infix operators #135

Open
michaelficarra opened this issue Jan 14, 2013 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@michaelficarra
Copy link
Owner

michaelficarra commented Jan 14, 2013

Same issue as jashkenas/coffeescript#2549. This should be easier to fix after the rules are consolidated by #112.

--- Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/825351-implicit-object-literal-as-right-operand-of-all-binary-infix-operators?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F33145&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F33145&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).
@michaelficarra
Copy link
Owner Author

See also jashkenas/coffeescript#2051

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant