You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Seems like this could be implemented with a small change in DXC: SampleCmpLevelZero uses the correct instruction, but fixes the LOD to 0. But passing a register is possible, so seems like implementation will be straightforward.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
SampleCmpLevel is similar to SampleCmpLevel0, except the LOD level can
be specified using either a const-offset, or a variable.
This should be available starting SM6.7
Fixesmicrosoft#6613
Signed-off-by: Nathan Gauër <[email protected]>
SampleCmpLevel is similar to SampleCmpLevel0, except the LOD level can
be specified using either a const-offset, or a variable. This should be
available starting SM6.7
Fixes#6613
---------
Signed-off-by: Nathan Gauër <[email protected]>
SM6.7 added SampleCmlLevel which is similar to
SampleCmp
, but which fixes the LOD at which the comparison is done.Seems like this could be implemented with a small change in DXC:
SampleCmpLevelZero
uses the correct instruction, but fixes the LOD to 0. But passing a register is possible, so seems like implementation will be straightforward.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: