Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 'attacking rate' option to the attacking tool. #4017

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

VipAlekseyPetrenko
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Enable the attacking tool to control the attacking rate, to allow for granular comparison between different DoS attack types.

Testing

Manually tested my changes with an attacker VM that has XDP option enabled and a target VM that has Windows HTTP server running.

Documentation

n/a

@VipAlekseyPetrenko VipAlekseyPetrenko requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2023 19:31
submodules/googletest Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
submodules/googletest Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nibanks
nibanks previously approved these changes Dec 19, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (428b52f) 87.19% compared to head (576029f) 86.13%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4017      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.19%   86.13%   -1.06%     
==========================================
  Files          56       56              
  Lines       16953    16953              
==========================================
- Hits        14782    14603     -179     
- Misses       2171     2350     +179     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@nibanks nibanks merged commit f79e0f3 into microsoft:main Dec 20, 2023
395 of 397 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants