Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v8] msys git succeeds but returns error code 255 which is neglible as far as I can tell. #21620

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dave-juicelabs
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes v8. The git tool returns a 255 when trying to checkout the googletest repo which itself has an issue with finding the default branch to checkout. Adding the --no-checkout seems to resolve any error associated with finding the default branch but git still returns 255. After looking through the code, it seems the 255 is not really relevant to any error and only seems to happen on the msys git version.

  • What does your PR fix?

    Fixes #...

  • Which triplets are supported/not supported? Have you updated the CI baseline?

    <all / linux, windows, ...>, <Yes/No>

  • Does your PR follow the maintainer guide?

    Yes

  • If you have added/updated a port: Have you run ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committed the result?

    Yes

If you are still working on the PR, open it as a Draft: https://github.blog/2019-02-14-introducing-draft-pull-requests/

@JackBoosY
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, we already found the google repos are unstable, maybe they will fix them in one week.
cc @BillyONeal

@JackBoosY JackBoosY added the category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support label Nov 23, 2021
@Neumann-A Neumann-A mentioned this pull request Nov 23, 2021
1 task
@BillyONeal
Copy link
Member

I was forced to engage Twitter Driven Development https://twitter.com/sokac/status/1463182302679220230

@BillyONeal
Copy link
Member

I think upstream has fixed it and as a result this PR should be closed. Do you agree?

@dave-juicelabs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Agreed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants