[many ports] Feature 'Introspection' support #22200

mkhon · 2021-12-25T20:07:39Z

Add introspection feature (requires #22199)

What does your PR fix?
Which triplets are supported/not supported? Have you updated the CI baseline?

all

Does your PR follow the maintainer guide?

Yes

If you have added/updated a port: Have you run ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committed the result?

Yes

If you are still working on the PR, open it as a Draft: https://github.blog/2019-02-14-introducing-draft-pull-requests/

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

After committing all other changes, the version database must be updated

git add -u && git commit
git checkout 772fe6cbce530cb3a5f0fee67b57e9861676e5d0 -- versions
./vcpkg x-add-version --all

Diff

diff --git a/versions/a-/atk.json b/versions/a-/atk.json
index 5ad310b..87a195d 100644
--- a/versions/a-/atk.json
+++ b/versions/a-/atk.json
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "versions": [
     {
-      "git-tree": "f495950bdb8912facf6557bec384c48637a09ca1",
+      "git-tree": "71caa75389bf64c69ffef34c3b04b704dd80dee7",
       "version": "2.36.0",
       "port-version": 3
     },
diff --git a/versions/g-/gdk-pixbuf.json b/versions/g-/gdk-pixbuf.json
index 206dd0e..5510412 100644
--- a/versions/g-/gdk-pixbuf.json
+++ b/versions/g-/gdk-pixbuf.json
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "versions": [
     {
-      "git-tree": "eee842df29e3955986f6febce333d6968da45b66",
+      "git-tree": "d808219b163b3157bae90200d80535299347161d",
       "version": "2.42.2",
       "port-version": 3
     },
diff --git a/versions/g-/graphene.json b/versions/g-/graphene.json
index 44f06a0..08e5225 100644
--- a/versions/g-/graphene.json
+++ b/versions/g-/graphene.json
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "versions": [
     {
-      "git-tree": "c56ed685d18a66357b64430ba985db489d656aa8",
+      "git-tree": "41f0fa3e3ae7821b6d92ed88f16aa74dab9a6e14",
       "version": "1.10.2",
       "port-version": 3
     },
diff --git a/versions/g-/gtk.json b/versions/g-/gtk.json
index 8f1f40a..4809f31 100644
--- a/versions/g-/gtk.json
+++ b/versions/g-/gtk.json
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "versions": [
     {
-      "git-tree": "eec8bf806f29d000f090982bbbfd0392d8166bb8",
+      "git-tree": "66f6b1bc59e866a3b8238df5a3f20a18b2cc3908",
       "version": "4.4.0",
       "port-version": 2
     },
diff --git a/versions/h-/harfbuzz.json b/versions/h-/harfbuzz.json
index a5366d7..8bf14dd 100644
--- a/versions/h-/harfbuzz.json
+++ b/versions/h-/harfbuzz.json
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "versions": [
     {
-      "git-tree": "dc8f8ea64d714f3b175689297a9aa85e01bc90c2",
+      "git-tree": "47d677b1b5476d9b986db8eb7ceb4ae67a692502",
       "version-semver": "3.0.0",
       "port-version": 2
     },
diff --git a/versions/p-/pango.json b/versions/p-/pango.json
index f191a30..d609043 100644
--- a/versions/p-/pango.json
+++ b/versions/p-/pango.json
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "versions": [
     {
-      "git-tree": "d90fba8f734e794580bcf215c11037acf13e20aa",
+      "git-tree": "845aba2ce1355860ef3e5e6dbdb19227af7c9985",
       "version": "1.48.10",
       "port-version": 2
     },

PhoebeHui · 2021-12-27T02:22:34Z

@mkhon, thanks for your PR! Could you please take a look at the failures in CI testing?

atk/gdk-pixbuf with x64-windows, x64-osx, x64-linux:

..\src\atk-2-09b87762bd.clean\atk\meson.build:138:2: ERROR: Dependency "gobject-introspection-1.0" not found, tried pkgconfig and cmake

pango with x64-windows, x64-osx, x64-linux:

Run-time dependency gobject-introspection-1.0 found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake)
Looking for a fallback subproject for the dependency gobject-introspection-1.0

..\src\40a4d027da-8df6f72e5e.clean\pango\meson.build:148:2: ERROR: Automatic wrap-based subproject downloading is disabled

graphene with x64-windows:

..\src\atk-2-09b87762bd.clean\atk\meson.build:138:2: ERROR: Dependency "gobject-introspection-1.0" not found, tried pkgconfig and cmake

mkhon · 2021-12-28T13:44:22Z

This PR depends on #22199 as mentioned in the description

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

After committing all other changes, the version database must be updated

git add -u && git commit
git checkout 05c411da6619971fd033c8a9d20c8cce07d5e42a -- versions
./vcpkg x-add-version --all

Diff

diff --git a/versions/p-/pango.json b/versions/p-/pango.json
index 0327972..3e39cc9 100644
--- a/versions/p-/pango.json
+++ b/versions/p-/pango.json
@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@
       "version": "1.50.3",
       "port-version": 1
     },
+    {
+      "git-tree": "024f716f80c8454769393287ef14a75de4785f32",
+      "version": "1.50.3",
+      "port-version": 0
+    },
     {
       "git-tree": "a9cc75941c3ff73920fb3900615d84bc6f1b423e",
       "version": "1.48.10",

PhoebeHui · 2021-12-29T03:31:33Z

I see, thanks for your response!

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

After committing all other changes, the version database must be updated

git add -u && git commit
git checkout 05c411da6619971fd033c8a9d20c8cce07d5e42a -- versions
./vcpkg x-add-version --all

Diff

diff --git a/versions/p-/pango.json b/versions/p-/pango.json
index 34874cb..c65c390 100644
--- a/versions/p-/pango.json
+++ b/versions/p-/pango.json
@@ -10,11 +10,6 @@
       "version": "1.50.3",
       "port-version": 0
     },
-    {
-      "git-tree": "024f716f80c8454769393287ef14a75de4785f32",
-      "version": "1.50.3",
-      "port-version": 0
-    },
     {
       "git-tree": "a9cc75941c3ff73920fb3900615d84bc6f1b423e",
       "version": "1.48.10",

mkhon · 2022-01-25T17:26:06Z

Can we remove requires:author-response tag from this one?

mkhon · 2022-01-26T19:53:17Z

@PhoebeHui #22199 has been merged so you can now test this PR (depends:different-pr tag can now be removed I guess)

PhoebeHui · 2022-01-27T03:20:38Z

@mkhon, could you merge from master and resolve conflicts? I have no permission to push the changes to this PR.

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

After committing all other changes, the version database must be updated

git add -u && git commit
git checkout 7baf7bc9f3390bab2f47e2bcbd35b065663bc80d -- versions
./vcpkg x-add-version --all

Diff

diff --git a/versions/h-/harfbuzz.json b/versions/h-/harfbuzz.json
index eeb491a..17f1a5f 100644
--- a/versions/h-/harfbuzz.json
+++ b/versions/h-/harfbuzz.json
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "versions": [
     {
-      "git-tree": "852d7b204335b195bf01c2b8bc41895fee3663aa",
+      "git-tree": "ccc65955dbcab3a0438f6027f050cd4acd57fc4a",
       "version-semver": "3.2.0",
       "port-version": 1
     },

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where a "license" field is missing.
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

ports/atk/vcpkg.json
ports/gdk-pixbuf/vcpkg.json
ports/graphene/vcpkg.json
ports/gtk/vcpkg.json
ports/harfbuzz/vcpkg.json
ports/pango/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field are listed at https://spdx.org/licenses/

mkhon · 2022-01-27T05:59:08Z

@PhoebeHui I rebased to the latest master and resolved the conflicts

github-actions

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where a "license" field is missing.
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

ports/atk/vcpkg.json
ports/gdk-pixbuf/vcpkg.json
ports/graphene/vcpkg.json
ports/gtk/vcpkg.json
ports/harfbuzz/vcpkg.json
ports/pango/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field are listed at https://spdx.org/licenses/

mkhon · 2022-01-27T12:01:22Z

Looks like latest arm64_windows build failed because of vcpkg bug:

Error: vcpkg has crashed; no additional details are available.
The source line is D:\a\_work\1\s\src\vcpkg\binarycaching.cpp(554)

https://dev.azure.com/vcpkg/public/_build/results?buildId=66548&view=logs&j=84da4f4a-968a-5b5c-16e9-f444c845396d&t=80e5e0c8-bb3b-5216-9f3f-2618d4e9f3f4&l=62

github-actions

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where a "license" field is missing.
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

ports/atk/vcpkg.json
ports/gdk-pixbuf/vcpkg.json
ports/graphene/vcpkg.json
ports/gtk/vcpkg.json
ports/harfbuzz/vcpkg.json
ports/pango/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field are listed at https://spdx.org/licenses/

PhoebeHui · 2022-01-28T01:47:33Z

Looks like latest arm64_windows build failed because of vcpkg bug:

Yes, it has been fixed in vcpkg-tool repo, and waiting for a new release, please ignore it now.

ras0219-msft · 2022-01-31T19:57:13Z

This seems like a maintenance nightmare if it affects every port that touches gobject.

A few questions to help us understand what the problem space is here:

Is introspection only supported for meson consumers?
Will every consumer of gobject potentially need a flag for this?
Does this make sense as a "global" setting? Does it make sense to only enable introspection for some libraries but not others?
Is this required to happen as part of the library's build or can it be done separately? For example, could gtk generate the introspection data for all of its dependencies?

ports/atk/portfile.cmake

mkhon · 2022-02-04T20:29:13Z

This seems like a maintenance nightmare if it affects every port that touches gobject.

A few questions to help us understand what the problem space is here:

Is introspection only supported for meson consumers?

I think not

Will every consumer of gobject potentially need a flag for this?

Linux packages are usually built with introspection enabled by default. I can modify the PR if the common sense is to do the same

Does this make sense as a "global" setting? Does it make sense to only enable introspection for some libraries but not others?

I think it makes sense to always build with introspection enabled

Is this required to happen as part of the library's build or can it be done separately? For example, could gtk generate the introspection data for all of its dependencies?

Yes and no.

If introspection data is built only when gtk is built, how gtk will know the introspection of a dependency (e.g. atk or pango) needs to be rebuilt when the dependency is upgraded (e.g. when atk is upgraded how do we know we need to rebuild its introspection data). I think this is the main reason interospection data is built along with the appropriate software package that owns the data structures.

Think of introspection as a kind of additional library that is shipped with every package that supports introspection

github-actions

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where a "license" field is missing.
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

ports/atk/vcpkg.json
ports/gdk-pixbuf/vcpkg.json
ports/graphene/vcpkg.json
ports/gtk/vcpkg.json
ports/harfbuzz/vcpkg.json
ports/pango/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field are listed at https://spdx.org/licenses/

github-actions

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where a "license" field is missing.
If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

ports/atk/vcpkg.json
ports/gdk-pixbuf/vcpkg.json
ports/graphene/vcpkg.json
ports/gtk/vcpkg.json
ports/harfbuzz/vcpkg.json
ports/pango/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field are listed at https://spdx.org/licenses/

JackBoosY · 2022-02-14T09:12:47Z

Can you please resolve the file conflicts?

github-actions

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where a "license" field is missing.

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

ports/atk/vcpkg.json
ports/gdk-pixbuf/vcpkg.json
ports/graphene/vcpkg.json
ports/harfbuzz/vcpkg.json
ports/pango/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

github-actions

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

ports/atk/vcpkg.json
ports/gdk-pixbuf/vcpkg.json
ports/graphene/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

mkhon · 2022-05-04T11:14:07Z

@JackBoosY I rebased to latest master. Can we get this merged?

JackBoosY · 2022-05-05T02:55:02Z

Seems there are some file conflicts, can you please resolve that first?

Thanks.

mkhon · 2022-05-05T14:15:42Z

Seems there are some file conflicts, can you please resolve that first?

Done

github-actions

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

ports/atk/vcpkg.json
ports/gdk-pixbuf/vcpkg.json
ports/graphene/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

JackBoosY · 2022-05-06T08:01:04Z

@ras0219-msft ping for reply.

github-actions

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

ports/graphene/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

JackBoosY · 2022-06-17T08:37:28Z

Can you please merge to master first?

JackBoosY · 2022-07-15T05:39:48Z

Convert this PR to draft since there is no progress.

JackBoosY · 2022-08-19T07:44:09Z

Closing this PR since it seems that no progress is being made. Please reopen if work is still being done.

JackBoosY assigned PhoebeHui Dec 26, 2021

JackBoosY added the category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist label Dec 26, 2021

github-actions bot requested changes Dec 27, 2021

View reviewed changes

PhoebeHui changed the title ~~Introspection support~~ [many ports] Feature 'Introspection' support Dec 27, 2021

PhoebeHui added the requires:author-response label Dec 27, 2021

PhoebeHui added the depends:different-pr This PR or Issue depends on a PR which has been filed label Dec 29, 2021

github-actions bot requested changes Dec 29, 2021

View reviewed changes

github-actions bot requested changes Dec 30, 2021

View reviewed changes

github-actions bot approved these changes Dec 30, 2021

View reviewed changes

mkhon mentioned this pull request Jan 5, 2022

[new port] gtk 3.24.34 port #22201

Closed

PhoebeHui removed the requires:author-response label Jan 26, 2022

PhoebeHui removed the depends:different-pr This PR or Issue depends on a PR which has been filed label Jan 27, 2022

PhoebeHui added the requires:author-response label Jan 27, 2022

github-actions bot requested changes Jan 27, 2022

View reviewed changes

github-actions bot approved these changes Jan 27, 2022

View reviewed changes

PhoebeHui removed the requires:author-response label Jan 28, 2022

PhoebeHui previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2022

View reviewed changes

PhoebeHui added the info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines label Jan 29, 2022

ras0219-msft added the requires:author-response label Jan 31, 2022

Neumann-A reviewed Jan 31, 2022

View reviewed changes

ports/atk/portfile.cmake Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

BillyONeal removed the info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines label Feb 3, 2022

github-actions bot approved these changes Feb 4, 2022

View reviewed changes

github-actions bot approved these changes Feb 5, 2022

View reviewed changes

PhoebeHui requested a review from ras0219-msft February 7, 2022 07:51

PhoebeHui added requires:vcpkg-team-review This PR or issue requires someone on the vcpkg team to take a further look. and removed requires:author-response labels Feb 14, 2022

github-actions bot approved these changes Feb 14, 2022

View reviewed changes

github-actions bot approved these changes May 4, 2022

View reviewed changes

JackBoosY added the requires:author-response label May 5, 2022

github-actions bot approved these changes May 5, 2022

View reviewed changes

JackBoosY removed the requires:author-response label May 6, 2022

Introspection support

b8e9263

github-actions bot approved these changes May 7, 2022

View reviewed changes

PhoebeHui assigned JackBoosY May 9, 2022

JackBoosY added the requires:author-response label Jun 17, 2022

ras0219-msft dismissed PhoebeHui’s stale review via b8e9263 June 23, 2022 19:58

JackBoosY marked this pull request as draft July 15, 2022 05:39

JackBoosY removed the requires:vcpkg-team-review This PR or issue requires someone on the vcpkg team to take a further look. label Jul 15, 2022

JackBoosY closed this Aug 19, 2022

mkhon deleted the feature/gtk-introspection branch September 28, 2022 19:05

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[many ports] Feature 'Introspection' support #22200

[many ports] Feature 'Introspection' support #22200

mkhon commented Dec 25, 2021

github-actions bot left a comment

PhoebeHui commented Dec 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

mkhon commented Dec 28, 2021

github-actions bot left a comment

PhoebeHui commented Dec 29, 2021

github-actions bot left a comment

mkhon commented Jan 25, 2022

mkhon commented Jan 26, 2022 •

edited

Loading

PhoebeHui commented Jan 27, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

mkhon commented Jan 27, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

mkhon commented Jan 27, 2022 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot left a comment

PhoebeHui commented Jan 28, 2022

ras0219-msft commented Jan 31, 2022

mkhon commented Feb 4, 2022 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

JackBoosY commented Feb 14, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

mkhon commented May 4, 2022

JackBoosY commented May 5, 2022

mkhon commented May 5, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

JackBoosY commented May 6, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

JackBoosY commented Jun 17, 2022

JackBoosY commented Jul 15, 2022

JackBoosY commented Aug 19, 2022

[many ports] Feature 'Introspection' support #22200

[many ports] Feature 'Introspection' support #22200

Conversation

mkhon commented Dec 25, 2021

What does your PR fix?

Which triplets are supported/not supported? Have you updated the CI baseline?

Does your PR follow the maintainer guide?

If you have added/updated a port: Have you run ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committed the result?

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

PhoebeHui commented Dec 27, 2021 • edited Loading

mkhon commented Dec 28, 2021

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

PhoebeHui commented Dec 29, 2021

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mkhon commented Jan 25, 2022

mkhon commented Jan 26, 2022 • edited Loading

PhoebeHui commented Jan 27, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mkhon commented Jan 27, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mkhon commented Jan 27, 2022 • edited Loading

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

PhoebeHui commented Jan 28, 2022

ras0219-msft commented Jan 31, 2022

mkhon commented Feb 4, 2022 • edited Loading

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

JackBoosY commented Feb 14, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mkhon commented May 4, 2022

JackBoosY commented May 5, 2022

mkhon commented May 5, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

JackBoosY commented May 6, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

JackBoosY commented Jun 17, 2022

JackBoosY commented Jul 15, 2022

JackBoosY commented Aug 19, 2022

If you have added/updated a port: Have you run `./vcpkg x-add-version --all` and committed the result?

PhoebeHui commented Dec 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

mkhon commented Jan 26, 2022 •

edited

Loading

mkhon commented Jan 27, 2022 •

edited

Loading

mkhon commented Feb 4, 2022 •

edited

Loading