Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing DataSet/BatchSet Promise #592

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2017
Merged

Removing DataSet/BatchSet Promise #592

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2017

Conversation

benrr101
Copy link
Contributor

Removing dead code that is no longer being used now that we have the websocket implementation. As far as I can tell, these web server handlers are no longer being called from the preview pane and since they were the only things that hinged on the dataset/batchset promise, we should be able to safely remove these.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@benrr101, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @anthonydresser, @kevcunnane and @sharonravindran to be potential reviewers.

@msftclas
Copy link

Hi @benrr101, I'm your friendly neighborhood Microsoft Pull Request Bot (You can call me MSBOT). Thanks for your contribution!


It looks like you're a Microsoft contributor (Ben Russell). If you're full-time, we DON'T require a Contribution License Agreement. If you are a vendor, please DO sign the electronic Contribution License Agreement. It will take 2 minutes and there's no faxing! https://cla.microsoft.com.

TTYL, MSBOT;

Copy link
Contributor

@anthonydresser anthonydresser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😄

@benrr101
Copy link
Contributor Author

Checks are passing locally, will check in.

@benrr101 benrr101 merged commit 82ba079 into dev Jan 10, 2017
@benrr101 benrr101 deleted the fix/removeDataSetPromise branch January 10, 2017 23:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants