NVIDIA Jetson Community Project Spotlight
@inproceedings{liu2019pvcnn,
title={Point-Voxel CNN for Efficient 3D Deep Learning},
author={Liu, Zhijian and Tang, Haotian and Lin, Yujun and Han, Song},
booktitle={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
year={2019}
}
The code is built with following libraries (see requirements.txt):
We follow the data pre-processing in PointCNN.
The code for preprocessing the S3DIS dataset is located in data/s3dis/.
One should first download the dataset from here, then run
python data/s3dis/prepare_data.py -d [path to unzipped dataset dir]We follow the data pre-processing in PointNet2. Please run the following command to down the dataset
./data/shapenet/download.shFor Frustum-PointNet backbone, we follow the data pre-processing in Frustum-Pointnets. One should first download the ground truth labels from here, then run
unzip data_object_label_2.zip
mv training/label_2 data/kitti/ground_truth
./data/kitti/frustum/download.shThe core code to implement PVConv is modules/pvconv.py. Its key idea costs only a few lines of code:
voxel_features, voxel_coords = voxelize(features, coords)
voxel_features = voxel_layers(voxel_features)
voxel_features = trilinear_devoxelize(voxel_features, voxel_coords, resolution)
fused_features = voxel_features + point_layers(features)Here we provide some of the pretrained models. The accuracy might vary a little bit compared to the paper, since we re-train some of the models for reproducibility.
We compare PVCNN against the PointNet, 3D-UNet and PointCNN performance as reported in the following table. The accuracy is tested following PointCNN. The list is keeping updated.
| Models | Overall Acc | mIoU |
|---|---|---|
| PointNet | 82.54 | 42.97 |
| PointNet (Reproduce) | 80.46 | 44.03 |
| PVCNN (0.125 x C) | 82.79 | 48.75 |
| PVCNN (0.25 x C) | 85.00 | 53.08 |
| 3D-UNet | 85.12 | 54.93 |
| PVCNN | 86.47 | 56.64 |
| PointCNN | 85.91 | 57.26 |
| PVCNN++ (0.5 x C) | 86.88 | 58.30 |
| PVCNN++ | 87.48 | 59.02 |
We compare PVCNN against the PointNet, PointNet++, 3D-UNet, Spider CNN and PointCNN performance as reported in the following table. The accuracy is tested following PointNet. The list is keeping updated.
| Models | mIoU |
|---|---|
| PointNet (Reproduce) | 83.5 |
| PointNet | 83.7 |
| 3D-UNet | 84.6 |
| PVCNN (0.25 x C) | 84.9 |
| PointNet++ SSG (Reproduce) | 85.1 |
| PointNet++ MSG | 85.1 |
| PVCNN (0.25 x C, DML) | 85.1 |
| SpiderCNN | 85.3 |
| PointNet++ MSG (Reproduce) | 85.3 |
| PVCNN (0.5 x C) | 85.5 |
| PVCNN | 85.8 |
| PointCNN | 86.1 |
| PVCNN (DML) | 86.1 |
We compare PVCNN (Efficient Version in the paper) against PointNets performance as reported in the following table. The accuracy is tested on val set following Frustum PointNets using modified code from kitti-object-eval-python. Since there is random sampling in Frustum Pointnets, random seed will influence the evaluation. All results provided by us are the average of 20 measurements with different seeds, and the best one of 20 measurements is shown in the parentheses. The list is keeping updated.
| Models | Car | Car | Car | Pedestrian | Pedestrian | Pedestrian | Cyclist | Cyclist | Cyclist |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Easy | Moderate | Hard | Easy | Moderate | Hard | Easy | Moderate | Hard | |
| Frustum PointNet | 83.26 | 69.28 | 62.56 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Frustum PointNet (Reproduce) | 85.24 (85.17) | 71.63 (71.56) | 63.79 (63.78) | 66.44 (66.83) | 56.90 (57.20) | 50.43 (50.54) | 77.14 (78.16) | 56.46 (57.41) | 52.79 (53.66) |
| Frustum PointNet++ | 83.76 | 70.92 | 63.65 | 70.00 | 61.32 | 53.59 | 77.15 | 56.49 | 53.37 |
| Frustum PointNet++ (Reproduce) | 84.72 (84.46) | 71.99 (71.95) | 64.20 (64.13) | 68.40 (69.27) | 60.03 (60.80) | 52.61 (53.19) | 75.56 (79.41) | 56.74 (58.65) | 53.33 (54.82) |
| Frustum PVCNN (Efficient) | 85.25 (85.30) | 72.12 (72.22) | 64.24 (64.36) | 70.60 (70.60) | 61.24 (61.35) | 56.25 (56.38) | 78.10 (79.79) | 57.45 (58.72) | 53.65 (54.81) |
For example, to test the downloaded pretrained models on S3DIS, one can run
python train.py [config-file] --devices [gpu-ids] --evaluate --configs.evaluate.best_checkpoint_path [path to the model checkpoint]
For instance, to evaluate PVCNN on GPU 0,1 (with 4096 points on Area 5 of S3DIS), one can run
python train.py configs/s3dis/pvcnn/area5.py --devices 0,1 --evaluate --configs.evaluate.best_checkpoint_path s3dis.pvcnn.area5.c1.pth.tar
Specially, for Frustum KITTI evaluation, one can specify the number of measurements to eliminate the random seed effects,
python train.py configs/kitti/frustum/pvcnne.py --devices 0 --evaluate --configs.evaluate.best_checkpoint_path kitti.frustum.pvcnne.pth.tar --configs.evaluate.num_tests [#measurements]
We provided several examples to train PVCNN with this repo:
- To train PVCNN on S3DIS holding out Area 5, one can run
python train.py configs/s3dis/pvcnn/area5/c1.py --devices 0,1
In general, to train a model, one can run
python train.py [config-file] --devices [gpu-ids]
NOTE: During training, the meters will provide accuracies and IoUs. However, these are just rough estimations. One have to run the following command to get accurate evaluation.
To evaluate trained models, one can do inference by running:
python train.py [config-file] --devices [gpu-ids] --evaluate
This repository is released under the MIT license. See LICENSE for additional details.
-
The code for data pre-processing and evaluation of S3DIS dataset is modified from PointCNN (MIT License).
-
The code for PointNet and PointNet++ primitive is modified from PointNet2 (MIT License) and Pointnet2_PyTorch. We modified the data layout and merged kernels to speed up and meet with PyTorch style.
-
The code for data pre-processing and evaluation of KITTI dataset is modified from Frustum-Pointnets (Apache 2.0 License).
-
The code for evaluation of KITTI dataset is modified from kitti-object-eval-python (MIT License).
