Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 2, 2024. It is now read-only.

HuggingFace Inference SUT #561

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

HuggingFace Inference SUT #561

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

bkorycki
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bkorycki bkorycki requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2024 16:15
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 11, 2024

MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅

Copy link
Contributor

@wpietri wpietri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long term I'd like to see much of the HuggingFace shenanigans pulled out elsewhere, but this is fine for now.

@bkorycki
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wpietri Like what specifically? The code all seems specific to huggingface to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@rogthefrog rogthefrog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏻

A few thoughts about how to address the together/huggingface/other client management in this comment.

@wpietri
Copy link
Contributor

wpietri commented Sep 11, 2024

@wpietri Like what specifically? The code all seems specific to huggingface to me.

That's exactly my concern. There's a lot about Hugging Face that's not particularly about a SUT. Since we have annotators that also deal with HuggingFace, there's duplication to be extracted. I also think the stuff about waiting to spin up a model is very much not about SUT-ness, and more about operational concerns.

@bkorycki bkorycki merged commit 1ce581b into main Sep 11, 2024
4 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 11, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants