Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added protos for managed catalog #10708

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 20, 2023
Merged

Conversation

kriscon-db
Copy link
Collaborator

@kriscon-db kriscon-db commented Dec 16, 2023

Related Issues/PRs

#xxx

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Add protos for managed catalog call and update the proto script

How is this PR tested?

  • [x ] Existing unit/integration tests
  • New unit/integration tests
  • Manual tests

Does this PR require documentation update?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. I've updated:
    • Examples
    • API references
    • Instructions

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for MLflow users.

What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?

Components

  • area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact logging
  • area/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflow
  • area/deployments: MLflow Deployments client APIs, server, and third-party Deployments integrations
  • area/docs: MLflow documentation pages
  • area/examples: Example code
  • area/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registry
  • area/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors
  • area/recipes: Recipes, Recipe APIs, Recipe configs, Recipe Templates
  • area/projects: MLproject format, project running backends
  • area/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFs
  • area/server-infra: MLflow Tracking server backend
  • area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologging

Interface

  • area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev server
  • area/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Models
  • area/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registry
  • area/windows: Windows support

Language

  • language/r: R APIs and clients
  • language/java: Java APIs and clients
  • language/new: Proposals for new client languages

Integrations

  • integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrations
  • integrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrations
  • integrations/databricks: Databricks integrations

How should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:

  • rn/none - No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" section
  • rn/breaking-change - The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" section
  • rn/feature - A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/bug-fix - A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/documentation - A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 16, 2023

Documentation preview for 33bf5da will be available here when this CircleCI job completes successfully.

More info

Copy link

@kriscon-db Thank you for the contribution! Could you fix the following issue(s)?

⚠ DCO check

The DCO check failed. Please sign off your commit(s) by following the instructions here. See https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-your-work for more details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the rn/none List under Small Changes in Changelogs. label Dec 16, 2023
optional bool include_browse = 9;

// Optional. Whether to include information of shallow clones or not if this is base table.
optional bool include_shallow_clones = 10;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor: do we need this? If the value is unspecified --> defaults to false, seems we'd just exclude shallow clone info, which we don't need (since we only need table ID)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So these were low cost flags to add (i.e. I didn't need to port over an entirely new proto object to support them). We can remove them and add them back in if/when we need them if you want this to be as minimal as possible.

optional string full_name_arg = 1;

// True if delta metadata should be included in the response.
optional bool include_delta_metadata = 3;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similarly do we need include_delta_metadata? Or ok to omit it and allow delta metadata to not-be returned always when we call this endpoint from the client

Copy link
Collaborator

@smurching smurching left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only minor comments, otherwise LG

@kriscon-db kriscon-db merged commit 090ffbb into mlflow:master Dec 20, 2023
37 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rn/none List under Small Changes in Changelogs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants