Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v0.6 backport] contenthash: ignore system and security xattrs in calculation #1517

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2020

Conversation

thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

@thaJeztah thaJeztah commented Jun 3, 2020

backport for the v0.6 / docker-19.03 branch

Signed-off-by: Tonis Tiigi <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 81e7113)
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <[email protected]>
@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member Author

@tonistiigi @AkihiroSuda ptal

@tonistiigi
Copy link
Member

if I remember correctly it was concluded that this was wrong and security.capability should not be excluded.

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member Author

good point; I'd have to check; do you know if that was addressed on master?

@tonistiigi
Copy link
Member

@thaJeztah I don't think so.

@mttradebyte
Copy link

@thaJeztah Do you know if anyone is working on the changes that @tonistiigi mentioned? Clamoring for this change at this point. I'd make them myself and PR but I'm sure it'd be quicker if a member of the project could make the changes and pull them in.

@tonistiigi
Copy link
Member

@mtanatwine #1526

@mttradebyte
Copy link

Looks like #1526 was merged, so can that get merged into this backport so we can get it in v19?

Signed-off-by: Tonis Tiigi <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b0d3737)
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <[email protected]>
@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member Author

Cherry-picked #1526. PTAL

@tonistiigi tonistiigi merged commit d1ef80c into moby:docker-19.03 Jul 16, 2020
@thaJeztah thaJeztah deleted the 0.6_backport_xattr_hash branch July 16, 2020 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants