-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify discrete and remove odd statement about Pantelides. #2887
Conversation
Resolves parts of modelica#2835
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally, I don't see anything controversial here, just some formulations that can be improved.
Still, I think this is a delicate issue that probably should pass more thorough review before making any changes, and I can imagine tools cutting corners when performing alias elimination, and I'm not sure what actually enforcing this would mean for existing models. To answer this, we probably need to see the complete collection of rules that require discrete
rather than discrete-time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Made some suggestions of various importance.
Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At most, only small details remaining; need some answers to tell.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good now.
Resolves parts of #2835