Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test(NODE-5300): add 7.0 to CI #3676

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 26, 2023
Merged

test(NODE-5300): add 7.0 to CI #3676

merged 2 commits into from
May 26, 2023

Conversation

baileympearson
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What is changing?

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

What is the motivation for this change?

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@baileympearson baileympearson changed the base branch from main to 4.x May 18, 2023 20:51
@baileympearson
Copy link
Contributor Author

evergreen retry

@nbbeeken nbbeeken self-assigned this May 25, 2023
@nbbeeken nbbeeken added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label May 25, 2023
@nbbeeken nbbeeken self-requested a review May 25, 2023 21:07
@baileympearson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nbbeeken Any comments or is this good-to-go?

@nbbeeken nbbeeken merged commit 8a73735 into 4.x May 26, 2023
@nbbeeken nbbeeken deleted the NODE-5300-add-7.0 branch May 26, 2023 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@nbbeeken nbbeeken nbbeeken approved these changes

Assignees

@nbbeeken nbbeeken

Labels
Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@baileympearson @nbbeeken