-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(NODE-5374): do not apply cursor transform in Cursor.hasNext #3746
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e73e32d
refactor: make cursor internal `next` function async-await
baileympearson 3683d0b
readablecursorstream uses async next variant
baileympearson 497b80e
test: add integration tests for bug and better integration tests for …
baileympearson 53e8cde
fix multiple transform bug
baileympearson 34424ed
close cursor on error from transform
baileympearson 9a4eecc
fix lint and refactor
baileympearson bf9e916
go back to set immediate
baileympearson 6e371ad
address PR comments
baileympearson 365ca27
be explicit about arguments to next
baileympearson a73f192
fix lint and failing test
baileympearson b1ce2a9
Merge branch 'main' into NODE-5372
durran File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume we are defaulting to
true
here as more methods would transform vs. methods that don't (hasNext
)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that was my logic. I also considered two other options:
blocking
andtransform
into an options object and requiring all callsites to explicitly set them for clarity (i.e.,next(this, { blocking: true, transform: false })
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I lean towards providing no default, for internal I prefer to make each call site define its inputs and because this isn't saving us a lot of refactors. I don't feel strongly though, feel free to resolve if we agree to leave it as is.