-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change joint_properties_ from std::vector to std::map #110
Comments
scchow
added a commit
to scchow/srdfdom
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
- Addresses moveit#110 - Refactored joint_properties to use a map of maps for streamlined access to joint properties - Removed JointProperty struct as information contained is redundant. - Updated tests to account for new getJointProperties signature
scchow
added a commit
to scchow/srdfdom
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
- Refactored joint_properties to use a map of maps for streamlined access to joint properties - Removed JointProperty struct as information contained is redundant. - Updated tests to account for new getJointProperties signature
scchow
added a commit
to scchow/srdfdom
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
- Addresses moveit#110 - Refactored joint_properties to use a map of maps for streamlined access to joint properties - Removed JointProperty struct as information contained is redundant. - Updated tests to account for new getJointProperties signature
scchow
added a commit
to scchow/srdfdom
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
- Addresses moveit#110 - Refactored joint_properties to use a map of maps for streamlined access to joint properties - Removed JointProperty struct as information contained is redundant. - Updated tests to account for new getJointProperties signature
6 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
https://github.com/ros-planning/srdfdom/blob/04c7726f2437d5b09bdc790b64d116057b81a90b/include/srdfdom/model.h#L317
To better reflect actual semantics, this should be changed as follows:
@scchow, it would be great if you could tackle this (and file a corresponding PR to the ROS2 branch as well).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: