-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
fixes issue #284, use new cross-browser scripting api for registering… #301
Conversation
Bumps [shell-quote](https://github.com/substack/node-shell-quote) from 1.7.2 to 1.7.3. - [Release notes](https://github.com/substack/node-shell-quote/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/substack/node-shell-quote/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/substack/node-shell-quote/compare/v1.7.2...1.7.3) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: shell-quote dependency-type: indirect ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
… content scripts
1dbe119
to
a8dcdf1
Compare
d66191f
to
a7b9a7b
Compare
4fd9ff2
to
75f8515
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The meat of it looks good! A couple functionality questions, and a couple small style things.
Another thing we should address: it might be worth it to add a "Chrome/MV3 support" column to that modules table in the README? since it seems we'll be updating these modules piecemeal as and when we need them. Doesn't necessarily need to be in the scope of this PR, but just wanted to put it on the radar as something that would be useful to consumers of this library (primarily future us!). |
Good idea, did this as well... I made it a single "Browser Support" column with the text "Firefox" and/or "Chrome", we could use browser icons later if we add more and need to save space, but this seemed simpler and more readable. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's gamble, try merging! jk
… content scripts
Review expectations: this has integration tests for Firefox (mv2) and Chrome (mv3), so I think just a visual check is OK. If you'd like to try loading this into an extension or load the test extension into your browser that's fine too (but probably redundant with the integration test).