You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
go to page 349 (it is the page that has the number 337 in the text itself)
What is the expected behavior? (add screenshot)
Notice the big product sign in equation 26.15 here for reference. And the inline big sum sign just below (Z=\sum ...).
(rendered by evince; evince --version "GNOME Document Viewer 3.10.3")
What went wrong? (add screenshot)
The big product sign in equation 26.15 looks weird. Also the inline big sum sign looks weird. The sum and product signs look weird on the next page too (and throughout the book integral signs and big brackets and big square roots look funny too)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue looks, on the face of it, like another duplicate of #2594. However, that one was fixed all the way back in 2016 and #9602 (comment) was posted more than a year later.
In closing though, I cannot image this being a problem after PR #9340 since all glyphs are now re-mapped to the Private Use Area (which ought to exclude them from any auto-hinting routines).
Attach (recommended) or Link to PDF file here:
itila.pdf
Configuration:
Steps to reproduce the problem:
What is the expected behavior? (add screenshot)
Notice the big product sign in equation 26.15 here for reference. And the inline big sum sign just below (Z=\sum ...).
(rendered by evince;
evince --version
"GNOME Document Viewer 3.10.3")What went wrong? (add screenshot)
The big product sign in equation 26.15 looks weird. Also the inline big sum sign looks weird. The sum and product signs look weird on the next page too (and throughout the book integral signs and big brackets and big square roots look funny too)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: