-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support nested objects and arrays in the model definition #113
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
354ff4e
feat: support nested objects and arrays in model definition
e83b894
chore(defineRelationalProperties): use custom "definePropertyAtPath" …
kettanaito 5ad7cdf
feat: store primary keys in the "PrimaryKey" class
kettanaito 91c35ce
feat: store relations in the "Relation" class
kettanaito de35162
fix: support querying through nested relations
kettanaito be847b7
test(update): add nested property update test
kettanaito 1f5315e
fix: support sorting through nested properties
kettanaito File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What was your intention behind adding this explicit
isFunction
check?Type-wise, at this point of processing
propertyDefinition
is a base type getter (() => BaseType
), in other words: always a function. Perhaps you wanted to guard this reduce against malformed user input?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After 2 months I don't exactly remember tbh. Probably what you guessed, otherwise something related to the very first implementation of the feature. It's probably redundant at this point.
Btw was just looking at line 66, where I wonder if logging "has a plain initial value" is still true for arrays (which now are an option)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries, I'm remembering everything around this myself.
Is it the wording that confuses you? I'd say it matters little as it's internal logging.