Publication output

[abhisrkckl]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 88.52% and project coverage change: +0.15% 🎉

Comparison is base (5b2c911) 68.29% compared to head (8f7792e) 68.45%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1621      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.29%   68.45%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         100      102       +2     
  Lines       23119    23301     +182     
  Branches     4011     4049      +38     
==========================================
+ Hits        15789    15950     +161     
- Misses       6341     6351      +10     
- Partials      989     1000      +11     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/pint/models/absolute_phase.py	95.83% <ø> (ø)
src/pint/models/binary_ell1.py	86.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pint/models/frequency_dependent.py	83.09% <ø> (ø)
src/pint/models/jump.py	76.66% <ø> (ø)
src/pint/models/noise_model.py	94.03% <ø> (ø)
src/pint/models/pulsar_binary.py	77.51% <ø> (ø)
src/pint/scripts/pintempo.py	81.42% <ø> (ø)
src/pint/models/parameter.py	82.22% <74.19%> (-0.29%)	⬇️
src/pint/output/publish.py	89.51% <89.51%> (ø)
src/pint/models/spindown.py	85.86% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[paulray]

Can you add an example of the rendered output PDF, here in the PR?

[abhisrkckl]

Here is a wideband example:

$ pintpublish J1614-2230_NANOGrav_12yv3.wb.gls.par J1614-2230_NANOGrav_12yv3.wb.tim --outfile J1614-2230_NANOGrav_12yv3.wb.tex 
$ pdflatex J1614-2230_NANOGrav_12yv3.wb.tex

J1614-2230_NANOGrav_12yv3.wb.pdf

[abhisrkckl]

Here is a narrowband example:

$ pintpublish B1855+09_NANOGrav_9yv1.gls.par B1855+09_NANOGrav_9yv1.tim --outfile B1855+09_NANOGrav_9yv1.tex 
$ pdflatex B1855+09_NANOGrav_9yv1.tex

B1855+09_NANOGrav_9yv1.pdf

[paulray]

Looks good! Some small suggestions:

• In the parameter values, the "-" signs should be in math mode so they render as minus signs rather than hyphens.
• I don't love "2.3e-16" for scientific notation. Could we use "$2.3 \times 10^{-16}$"?

[abhisrkckl]

I have implemented latex formatting for numbers and units. Now the output looks like this

[paulray]

I like the LaTeX formatting! The only change I'd make is us ApJ style of "mas yr$^{-1}$" instead of the fraction.

[abhisrkckl]

Disabled fraction.