wip docs: Restructure docs #988
Draft
+105
−156
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
documentation
MarcoGorelli
force-pushed
the
restructure-docs
branch
3 times, most recently
from
2ba2f1a
to
1531cbd
Compare
MarcoGorelli
force-pushed
the
restructure-docs
branch
from
1531cbd
to
3625feb
Compare
FBruzzesi
reviewed
Sep 17, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be out of the coming_from_pandas section?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in my head I was thinking "if you're coming from pandas, rest assured, this won't make your pandas code slower", but idk, writing docs is so hard
|
Should we relocate the I often forget that we have a (And it appears to be handwritten, not directly generated.) 
|
10 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think there's too many pages in the docs at the moment
I also don't really like the landing page for the api docs
It looks a bit shorter and simpler now:
What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Related issues
Checklist
If you have comments or can explain your changes, please do so below.