Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Label-node for å kunne navngi trær #133

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Label-node for å kunne navngi trær #133

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

tendestad
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.


@Override
public String identifikator() {
return identifikatorIkkeTom().orElseGet(() -> "(" + spec1.identifikator() + ")");
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Skulle du hatt med label i orElseGet "(" + label + " " + spec1.identifikator() ?

Copy link
Collaborator

@jolarsen jolarsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Jeg vet ikke helt om jeg forstår hvordan den er tenkt brukt .
Evt relasjon til a) beskrivelse i andre operatorer og b) evt forenkling til å serialisere kun Operator.name()
Vi ser at vi har mye tilfelle av at CondOr har samme id som første Cond (if-clause) - redundant å angi nodeId og ruleId for en operator - kanskje også beskrivelse mm. Da bortfaller vel behovet for denne?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants