Skip to content

Datatype properties #31

Answered by jpalmeida
ManuelSimoes asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I'm not sure I understand the question. Do you mean that all datatype properties in gUFO-based ontologies should be declared as specializations of those? There's no such recommendation.

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@ManuelSimoes
Comment options

Answer selected by ManuelSimoes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #24 on July 05, 2024 17:55.