Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

apoc.temporal.toZonedTemporal missing in temporal docs page #2748

Closed
jexp opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2821
Closed

apoc.temporal.toZonedTemporal missing in temporal docs page #2748

jexp opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2821
Labels

Comments

@jexp
Copy link
Member

jexp commented Apr 13, 2022

it is mentioned here

https://neo4j.com/labs/apoc/4.4/temporal/datetime-conversions/#datetime-available-procedures-apoc.date.parseAsZonedDateTime

that it has been moved but doesn't show up here

https://neo4j.com/labs/apoc/4.4/temporal/temporal-conversions/

@jexp jexp added the docs label Apr 13, 2022
vga91 added a commit to vga91/neo4j-apoc-procedures that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2022
vga91 added a commit to vga91/neo4j-apoc-procedures that referenced this issue May 11, 2022
vga91 added a commit that referenced this issue May 19, 2022
…age (#2821)

* Fixes #2748: apoc.temporal.toZonedTemporal missing in temporal docs page

* changed note deprecation

* small doc change
neo4j-oss-build pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 19, 2022
…age (#2821)

* Fixes #2748: apoc.temporal.toZonedTemporal missing in temporal docs page

* changed note deprecation

* small doc change
neo4j-oss-build pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 19, 2022
…age (#2821)

* Fixes #2748: apoc.temporal.toZonedTemporal missing in temporal docs page

* changed note deprecation

* small doc change
vga91 pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2022
neo4j-oss-build added a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant