Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump viser #3234

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024
Merged

Bump viser #3234

merged 12 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

ginazhouhuiwu
Copy link
Contributor

Viser api changes and bump version to 0.2.1

Copy link
Collaborator

@brentyi brentyi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎊 🎊 🎊

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ def __init__(
):
super().__init__()

self._ws_server = viser.infra.Server(host, port, http_server_root=None, verbose=False)
self._ws_server = ViserServer(host, port, http_server_root=None, verbose=False)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

change is made

pyproject.toml Outdated
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ dependencies = [
"torchvision>=0.14.1",
"torchmetrics[image]>=1.0.1",
"typing_extensions>=4.4.0",
"viser==0.1.27",
"viser==0.2.1",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we can actually bump to 0.2.2 once nerfstudio-project/viser#223 is merged, since that resolves some unlikely but plausible race conditions in the messaging infra!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bumped!

Copy link
Collaborator

@kerrj kerrj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, as long as @brentyi doesn't have any other changes

@brentyi
Copy link
Collaborator

brentyi commented Jun 27, 2024

Yeah I think we can go ahead with the bump as soon as these fixes are merged + we do a viser release, otherwise we have some regressions:
nerfstudio-project/viser#223
nerfstudio-project/viser#228
nerfstudio-project/viser#229

@ginazhouhuiwu ginazhouhuiwu merged commit c3bcee8 into main Jun 28, 2024
2 checks passed
@ginazhouhuiwu ginazhouhuiwu deleted the viser_api_change branch June 28, 2024 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants