Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Virtual Chassis membercount issue #13813

Closed
FrondorM opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #13823
Closed

Virtual Chassis membercount issue #13813

FrondorM opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #13823
Assignees
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@FrondorM
Copy link

NetBox version

v3.6.1

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

For full reproduction create at least 2 member devices as a prerequisite.

  1. Go to Virtual Chassis and press Add.
  2. Name your Virtual Chassis f.e. SW0201
  3. Add two member switches f.e. SW0201.1 and SW0201.2
  4. Click Create

Selecting a site/rack or not during creation does not make a difference in the observed behaviour.

Expected Behavior

Creating a Virtual Chassis with the membercount being 2.

Observed Behavior

Virtual Chassis is created with membercount being 0.
VC-0

Adding a new switch member to an already existing Virtual Chassis also doesn't increase the membercount.
VC-extramember

Deleting a member from the Virtual Chassis does decrease the membercount!
VC-minus

@FrondorM FrondorM added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Sep 19, 2023
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation labels Sep 19, 2023
@arthanson arthanson self-assigned this Sep 19, 2023
@arthanson arthanson removed the status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation label Sep 19, 2023
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation label Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants