Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: global config sepc #1725

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 20, 2021
Merged

feat: global config sepc #1725

merged 11 commits into from
Jan 20, 2021

Conversation

JGAntunes
Copy link
Contributor

- Summary

Addresses #1530 (picking up on the discussion in there) and #526. The idea is to cli's global config to one place only (OS based) which for Linux means following the XDG base directory spec. We use the legacy directory config and use it as a default basis for the config init, once that is done we delete it.

A couple of notes:

  • Given we're undergoing a destructive operation not sure if we should be more careful about it (or maybe avoid it altogether in an initial phase?). However seems to me the only thing we're storing right now in this config is the auth token, which wouldn't be a totally irreversible process if something goes sideways (i.e. login again).
  • I was wondering if it would be worth adding a couple of debug logs to the getGlobalConfig stating we've found a legacy config and deleted it successfully? 🤔
  • From what I gathered the only other place where we're relying on the present ~/.netlify directory is for liveTunnel - https://github.com/netlify/cli/blob/master/src/utils/live-tunnel.js#L48 - specifically to hold the live-tunnel binary. Given we've changed the getPathInHome implementation this would mean that the binary would now live in the new config directory and would need to be downloaded again. However, we're not removing the live-tunnel bin or the whole ~/.netlify dir, so I'm wondering if it's better to (at least for now) just use the legacy path?

- Test plan

$> cat /Users/jgantunes/Library/Preferences/netlify/config.json
cat: /Users/jgantunes/Library/Preferences/netlify/config.json: No such file or directory
$> cat ~/.netlify/config.json
{
	"telemetryDisabled": false,
	"cliId": "xxxxx",
	"userId": "xxxx",
	"users": {
		"xxxxx": {
			"id": "xxxxxx",
			"name": "João Antunes",
			"email": "[email protected]",
			"auth": {
				"token": "xxxx",
				"github": {}
			}
		}
	}
}
$> ./bin/run status
──────────────────────┐
 Current Netlify User │
──────────────────────┘
Name:  João Antunes
Email: [email protected]
Teams:
  YOLO:            Owner Collaborator
  Netlify Testing: Owner Collaborator Controller
$> cat ~/.netlify/config.json
cat: /Users/jgantunes/.netlify/config.json: No such file or directory
$> cat /Users/jgantunes/Library/Preferences/netlify/config.json
{
	"telemetryDisabled": false,
	"cliId": "xxxxx",
	"userId": "xxxx",
	"users": {
		"xxxxx": {
			"id": "xxxxxx",
			"name": "João Antunes",
			"email": "[email protected]",
			"auth": {
				"token": "xxxx",
				"github": {}
			}
		}
	}
}

- Description for the changelog

Chaging the global config path specification to a per OS standard.

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

My very own cat soundcard!

IMG_1178

@JGAntunes JGAntunes requested a review from a team as a code owner January 12, 2021 19:33
@github-actions github-actions bot added the type: feature code contributing to the implementation of a feature and/or user facing functionality label Jan 12, 2021
Copy link
Member

@eduardoboucas eduardoboucas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 🚀

src/utils/get-global-config.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@erezrokah erezrokah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work @JGAntunes and thank you for sharing your concerns.
The more I think about it the more I tend to agree with you.
I think we should default to using the old config and not remove it (at least as an initial step).
The live tunnel is one issue and the Large Media credential helper is another.
The latter is installed as an oclif plugin:
https://docs.netlify.com/large-media/requirements-and-limitations/#requirements
so it will keep using the legacy path anyway.

We're in the process of migrating it so probably better to wait with removing the legacy path.

cliId: uuidv4(),
}

const getGlobalConfig = async function () {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[sand] Not sure there is big benefit for it, but would it make sense to use lodash.once to resolve the config only a single time.
For example in utils/command.js the function will be invoked twice (once for the token and once for the whole config).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep! Good one, I actually tested it out locally and saw some specifc commands could actually trigger a call to globalConfig multiple times, I wanted to mention that but just forgot 🤦 I think some kind of memoisation like lodash.once would definitely be a good thing here 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@ehmicky ehmicky Jan 13, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small suggestion: memoize-one is also an option. It does the same thing but the code looks much clearer. Lodash code always looks so verbose :/

lodash.once():

var FUNC_ERROR_TEXT = 'Expected a function';

var INFINITY = 1 / 0,
    MAX_INTEGER = 1.7976931348623157e+308,
    NAN = 0 / 0;

var symbolTag = '[object Symbol]';

var reTrim = /^\s+|\s+$/g;

var reIsBadHex = /^[-+]0x[0-9a-f]+$/i;

var reIsBinary = /^0b[01]+$/i;

var reIsOctal = /^0o[0-7]+$/i;

var freeParseInt = parseInt;

var objectProto = Object.prototype;

var objectToString = objectProto.toString;

function before(n, func) {
  var result;
  if (typeof func != 'function') {
    throw new TypeError(FUNC_ERROR_TEXT);
  }
  n = toInteger(n);
  return function() {
    if (--n > 0) {
      result = func.apply(this, arguments);
    }
    if (n <= 1) {
      func = undefined;
    }
    return result;
  };
}

function once(func) {
  return before(2, func);
}

function isObject(value) {
  var type = typeof value;
  return !!value && (type == 'object' || type == 'function');
}

function isObjectLike(value) {
  return !!value && typeof value == 'object';
}

function isSymbol(value) {
  return typeof value == 'symbol' ||
    (isObjectLike(value) && objectToString.call(value) == symbolTag);
}

function toFinite(value) {
  if (!value) {
    return value === 0 ? value : 0;
  }
  value = toNumber(value);
  if (value === INFINITY || value === -INFINITY) {
    var sign = (value < 0 ? -1 : 1);
    return sign * MAX_INTEGER;
  }
  return value === value ? value : 0;
}

function toInteger(value) {
  var result = toFinite(value),
      remainder = result % 1;

  return result === result ? (remainder ? result - remainder : result) : 0;
}

function toNumber(value) {
  if (typeof value == 'number') {
    return value;
  }
  if (isSymbol(value)) {
    return NAN;
  }
  if (isObject(value)) {
    var other = typeof value.valueOf == 'function' ? value.valueOf() : value;
    value = isObject(other) ? (other + '') : other;
  }
  if (typeof value != 'string') {
    return value === 0 ? value : +value;
  }
  value = value.replace(reTrim, '');
  var isBinary = reIsBinary.test(value);
  return (isBinary || reIsOctal.test(value))
    ? freeParseInt(value.slice(2), isBinary ? 2 : 8)
    : (reIsBadHex.test(value) ? NAN : +value);
}

module.exports = once;

memoize-one:

  function areInputsEqual(newInputs, lastInputs) {
      if (newInputs.length !== lastInputs.length) {
          return false;
      }
      for (var i = 0; i < newInputs.length; i++) {
          if (newInputs[i] !== lastInputs[i]) {
              return false;
          }
      }
      return true;
  }

  function memoizeOne(resultFn, isEqual) {
      if (isEqual === void 0) { isEqual = areInputsEqual; }
      var lastThis;
      var lastArgs = [];
      var lastResult;
      var calledOnce = false;
      function memoized() {
          var newArgs = [];
          for (var _i = 0; _i < arguments.length; _i++) {
              newArgs[_i] = arguments[_i];
          }
          if (calledOnce && lastThis === this && isEqual(newArgs, lastArgs)) {
              return lastResult;
          }
          lastResult = resultFn.apply(this, newArgs);
          calledOnce = true;
          lastThis = this;
          lastArgs = newArgs;
          return lastResult;
      }
      return memoized;
  }

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point @ehmicky! So I was actually looking at lodash.once and was considering alternatives, however seems like we already have lodash as a dependency - https://github.com/netlify/cli/blob/master/package.json#L132 - taking that into account would it be worth bringing another dependency? Might be something worth considering if we plan on decoupling lodash from the project (or at least shift to depending only on the specific lodash modules we need).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point!
Either works, your call 👍

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given we're keeping the "legacy" config path for now, would it be worth it creating an issue just to track this "tech debt"? CC @erezrokah

Copy link
Contributor

@ehmicky ehmicky Jan 13, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! 👍
About adding an issue for future dead code removal: this would be a good idea.

Quick question: was there any way to use this.netlify.globalConfig instead of calling getGlobalConfig() in the telemetry and hooks code? This would remove the need to memoize. Feel free to discard this comment if not relevant, I was just curious :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch @ehmicky. I guess it would be possible and it would probably make a lot of sense for the track/identify telemetry functions to receive the required config via its parameters instead of requiring it. For the hooks however, I'm still digging through oclifs arch but seems like they don't have access to the base command instance - https://oclif.io/docs/hooks#lifecycle-events 😕. We also have this static getToken function that depends on the global-config - https://github.com/netlify/cli/blob/master/src/utils/command.js#L313 - but seems like it's only being called on the deploy test - https://github.com/netlify/cli/blob/master/tests/command.deploy.test.js#L8 (?)

Tbh I think it makes sense to avoid this memoisation 🤔 maybe eventually remove it. Just not 100% of what would be the impact of doing it right now, given the global-config seems to be tied to a couple of different places.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could move forward with memoisation and open another issue to refactor the code to use this.netlify.globalConfig.
WDYT?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good! 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: dx needs docs type: feature code contributing to the implementation of a feature and/or user facing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants