Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sdk-vpp#370] Use abstract sockets for memif #369

Conversation

Bolodya1997
Copy link

@Bolodya1997 Bolodya1997 commented Sep 8, 2021

Description

Modifies memif to use abstract sockets.

Depends on networkservicemesh/api#113.

Issue link

#370

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Added unit testing to cover
  • Tested manually
  • Tested by integration testing
  • Have not tested

Types of changes

  • Bug fix
  • New functionallity
  • Documentation
  • Refactoring
  • CI

@Bolodya1997 Bolodya1997 force-pushed the sdk-vpp#357/abstract-sockets branch 2 times, most recently from f0bf411 to f563fa9 Compare September 9, 2021 04:21
@Bolodya1997 Bolodya1997 marked this pull request as draft September 9, 2021 06:03
@Bolodya1997 Bolodya1997 force-pushed the sdk-vpp#357/abstract-sockets branch 4 times, most recently from d95a637 to 5232317 Compare September 9, 2021 06:29
@Bolodya1997 Bolodya1997 force-pushed the sdk-vpp#357/abstract-sockets branch 8 times, most recently from a316a41 to a69abe2 Compare September 15, 2021 09:05
@Bolodya1997 Bolodya1997 force-pushed the sdk-vpp#357/abstract-sockets branch 2 times, most recently from a7aad65 to 75da0d2 Compare October 25, 2021 10:05
@Bolodya1997 Bolodya1997 changed the title [POC] Use abstract sockets for memif [sdk-vpp#357] Use abstract sockets for memif Oct 25, 2021
@Bolodya1997 Bolodya1997 changed the title [sdk-vpp#357] Use abstract sockets for memif [sdk-vpp#370] Use abstract sockets for memif Oct 27, 2021
@Bolodya1997 Bolodya1997 force-pushed the sdk-vpp#357/abstract-sockets branch 6 times, most recently from de87a1c to f6a28f2 Compare October 27, 2021 09:53
Vladimir Popov added 3 commits November 3, 2021 20:50
@Bolodya1997 Bolodya1997 marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2021 13:50
@Mixaster995 Mixaster995 self-assigned this Nov 29, 2021
@Mixaster995 Mixaster995 mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2021
@denis-tingaikin
Copy link
Member

This is done in #470

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants