-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Plan for collaborator session in Dublin #159
Comments
What would use for an easy retro type type tool? |
Agenda
|
Actions
|
@nodejs/members We discussed in the next-10 meeting today and as part of the collaborator summit we'd like to brainstorm technical priorities and what's going well/not so well in the project. There are 2 easy retro board, it would be great to have you all add your thoughts by adding entries to the easy retro boards. The two easy retro boards for those are:
This comment has lists for past boards if you need some additional context - #159 (comment) |
also the result from the second board edit: faster than me @mhdawson thanks a lot for posting both |
Technology Trend 2021TypeScript / Type Technology Trend 2022ESM support (new) Technology take 2021-2022Types / TS need to be a core subject (linked to the new tc39 type proposal - also PR and discussion about linking TS) Some stuff are in progress
Node.js features 2021Modern HTTP (undici) Node.js features 2022Docs (+1) Features take 2021-2022Documentation is a key point to adress (next-10 initiative on the way) Some functionnalityes landed:
Other 2021vulnerabily management and reporting Other 2022Improving CI reliability (new) Other take 2021-2022Vulnerability and security are key |
Key focus areas 2021collaborator Key focus areas 2022being well welcomed Key take 2021-2022Good collaboration coming but hard to retain Obstacles 2021Consensus model Obstacles 2022flaky CI / test Obstacle 2021-2022Area without enough contributors (project size, burnout, ...) working well 2021Active working groups working well 2022PR process Working well take 2021-2022Working group onboarding collaborator and people joining seems fine |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: