test: improve test-child-process-fork-and-spawn #10273
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
test
santigimeno
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2016
| @@ -20,6 +20,6 @@ switch (process.argv[2] || '') { | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| function checkExit(statusCode) { | |||
| assert.equal(statusCode, 0); | |||
| assert.strictEqual(statusCode, 0); | |||
| process.nextTick(process.exit); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you can remove the process.nextTick(process.exit);
evanlucas
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2016
lpinca
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2016
edsadr
force-pushed
the
child-process-fork
branch
from
a0ccada
to
f1ec74f
Compare
|
Implemented @santigimeno suggestion, @lpinca could you please set the CI again? |
cjihrig
approved these changes
Dec 16, 2016
* use const instead of var for required modules * use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal * remove unnecessary process.nextTick
edsadr
force-pushed
the
child-process-fork
branch
from
f1ec74f
to
8a4bc9e
Compare
|
@cjihrig just changed |
italoacasas
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2016
|
Landed 8b367c5 |
italoacasas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2016
* use const instead of var for required modules * use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal * remove unnecessary process.nextTick PR-URL: #10273 Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
cjihrig
pushed a commit
to cjihrig/node
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2016
* use const instead of var for required modules * use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal * remove unnecessary process.nextTick PR-URL: nodejs#10273 Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Merged
cjihrig
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2016
* use const instead of var for required modules * use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal * remove unnecessary process.nextTick PR-URL: #10273 Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2017
* use const instead of var for required modules * use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal * remove unnecessary process.nextTick PR-URL: #10273 Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2017
* use const instead of var for required modules * use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal * remove unnecessary process.nextTick PR-URL: #10273 Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2017
* use const instead of var for required modules * use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal * remove unnecessary process.nextTick PR-URL: #10273 Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test
Description of change