-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps: backport 224d376 from V8 upstream #10546
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
v6.x
v8 engine
Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency.
labels
Dec 30, 2016
@jBarz can you squash the patch bump into the first commit please |
jBarz
force-pushed
the
v8_new_delete_v6
branch
from
December 30, 2016 23:44
cc83464
to
0984a35
Compare
jBarz
force-pushed
the
v8_new_delete_v6
branch
from
January 18, 2017 22:27
0984a35
to
74e88c4
Compare
jBarz
changed the title
deps: cherry-pick 224d37 from V8 upstream
deps: backport 224d376 from V8 upstream
Jan 18, 2017
Orignial commit message: Abort in delete operators that shouldn't be called. Section 3.2 of the C++ standard states that destructor definitions implicitly "use" operator delete functions. Therefore, these operator delete functions must be defined even if they are never called by user code explicitly. http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/ cwg_defects.html#261 gcc allows them to remain as empty definitions. However, not all compilers allow this. (e.g. xlc on zOS). This pull request creates definitions which if ever called, result in an abort. [email protected],[email protected] BUG= LOG=N Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2588433002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#41981}
jBarz
force-pushed
the
v8_new_delete_v6
branch
from
January 18, 2017 22:30
74e88c4
to
247a23c
Compare
Just change the commit message to say backport instead of cherry-pick |
jasnell
approved these changes
Jan 19, 2017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rubber stamp LGTM
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2017
Orignial commit message: Abort in delete operators that shouldn't be called. Section 3.2 of the C++ standard states that destructor definitions implicitly "use" operator delete functions. Therefore, these operator delete functions must be defined even if they are never called by user code explicitly. http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/ cwg_defects.html#261 gcc allows them to remain as empty definitions. However, not all compilers allow this. (e.g. xlc on zOS). This pull request creates definitions which if ever called, result in an abort. [email protected],[email protected] BUG= LOG=N Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2588433002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41981} PR-URL: #10546 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
landed in 6d3f82c |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2017
Orignial commit message: Abort in delete operators that shouldn't be called. Section 3.2 of the C++ standard states that destructor definitions implicitly "use" operator delete functions. Therefore, these operator delete functions must be defined even if they are never called by user code explicitly. http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/ cwg_defects.html#261 gcc allows them to remain as empty definitions. However, not all compilers allow this. (e.g. xlc on zOS). This pull request creates definitions which if ever called, result in an abort. [email protected],[email protected] BUG= LOG=N Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2588433002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41981} PR-URL: #10546 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
2 tasks
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2017
Orignial commit message: Abort in delete operators that shouldn't be called. Section 3.2 of the C++ standard states that destructor definitions implicitly "use" operator delete functions. Therefore, these operator delete functions must be defined even if they are never called by user code explicitly. http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/ cwg_defects.html#261 gcc allows them to remain as empty definitions. However, not all compilers allow this. (e.g. xlc on zOS). This pull request creates definitions which if ever called, result in an abort. [email protected],[email protected] BUG= LOG=N Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2588433002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41981} PR-URL: #10546 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX)Affected core subsystem(s)
v8