Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deps: backport 224d376 from V8 upstream #10546

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jBarz
Copy link
Contributor

@jBarz jBarz commented Dec 30, 2016

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX)
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

v8

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added v6.x v8 engine Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency. labels Dec 30, 2016
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

MylesBorins commented Dec 30, 2016

@jBarz can you squash the patch bump into the first commit please

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@jBarz jBarz changed the title deps: cherry-pick 224d37 from V8 upstream deps: backport 224d376 from V8 upstream Jan 18, 2017
Orignial commit message:
  Abort in delete operators that shouldn't be called.

  Section 3.2 of the C++ standard states that destructor
  definitions implicitly "use" operator delete functions.
  Therefore, these operator delete functions must be
  defined even if they are never called by user code
  explicitly.
  http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/
  cwg_defects.html#261

  gcc allows them to remain as empty definitions. However,
  not all compilers allow this. (e.g. xlc on zOS). This pull
  request creates definitions which if ever called, result
  in an abort.

  [email protected],[email protected]
  BUG=
  LOG=N

  Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2588433002
  Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#41981}
@jBarz
Copy link
Contributor Author

jBarz commented Jan 18, 2017

Just change the commit message to say backport instead of cherry-pick

Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rubber stamp LGTM

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2017
Orignial commit message:
  Abort in delete operators that shouldn't be called.

  Section 3.2 of the C++ standard states that destructor
  definitions implicitly "use" operator delete functions.
  Therefore, these operator delete functions must be
  defined even if they are never called by user code
  explicitly.
  http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/
  cwg_defects.html#261

  gcc allows them to remain as empty definitions. However,
  not all compilers allow this. (e.g. xlc on zOS). This pull
  request creates definitions which if ever called, result
  in an abort.

  [email protected],[email protected]
  BUG=
  LOG=N

  Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2588433002
  Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41981}

PR-URL: #10546
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

landed in 6d3f82c

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2017
Orignial commit message:
  Abort in delete operators that shouldn't be called.

  Section 3.2 of the C++ standard states that destructor
  definitions implicitly "use" operator delete functions.
  Therefore, these operator delete functions must be
  defined even if they are never called by user code
  explicitly.
  http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/
  cwg_defects.html#261

  gcc allows them to remain as empty definitions. However,
  not all compilers allow this. (e.g. xlc on zOS). This pull
  request creates definitions which if ever called, result
  in an abort.

  [email protected],[email protected]
  BUG=
  LOG=N

  Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2588433002
  Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41981}

PR-URL: #10546
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2017
@jBarz jBarz deleted the v8_new_delete_v6 branch January 24, 2017 17:11
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2017
Orignial commit message:
  Abort in delete operators that shouldn't be called.

  Section 3.2 of the C++ standard states that destructor
  definitions implicitly "use" operator delete functions.
  Therefore, these operator delete functions must be
  defined even if they are never called by user code
  explicitly.
  http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/
  cwg_defects.html#261

  gcc allows them to remain as empty definitions. However,
  not all compilers allow this. (e.g. xlc on zOS). This pull
  request creates definitions which if ever called, result
  in an abort.

  [email protected],[email protected]
  BUG=
  LOG=N

  Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2588433002
  Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41981}

PR-URL: #10546
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
v8 engine Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants