-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
timers: refactor timer list processing #18582
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
const common = require('../common.js'); | ||
|
||
// The following benchmark sets up n * 1e6 unpooled timeouts, | ||
// then measures their execution on the next uv tick | ||
|
||
const bench = common.createBenchmark(main, { | ||
n: [1e6], | ||
}); | ||
|
||
function main({ n }) { | ||
let count = 0; | ||
|
||
// Function tracking on the hidden class in V8 can cause misleading | ||
// results in this benchmark if only a single function is used — | ||
// alternate between two functions for a fairer benchmark | ||
|
||
function cb() { | ||
count++; | ||
if (count === n) | ||
bench.end(n); | ||
} | ||
function cb2() { | ||
count++; | ||
if (count === n) | ||
bench.end(n); | ||
} | ||
|
||
for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) { | ||
// unref().ref() will cause each of these timers to | ||
// allocate their own handle | ||
setTimeout(i % 2 ? cb : cb2, 1).unref().ref(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
bench.start(); | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I personally feel like it would also be better to move the start above the loop to include that time in the benchmark as I would say the creation time is important as well. But I guess you explicitly wanted to only measure the execution time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, we have other tests that check the creation time. This way there's less noise in assessing the execution time.