Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: add and unify return statements in crypto.md #19853

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

doc: add and unify return statements in crypto.md #19853

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

Conform return statements to the style guide and tool parsers.

Also bring back a description fragment that seems to be erroneously deleted in
1e07acd (cc @tniessen)

Conform return statements to the style guide and tool parsers.

Also bring back a description fragment
that seems to be erroneously deleted in
1e07acd
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory. labels Apr 6, 2018
@vsemozhetbyt vsemozhetbyt added the crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem. label Apr 6, 2018
@vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vsemozhetbyt vsemozhetbyt added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Apr 6, 2018
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rubber-stamp LGTM if CI is green.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Apr 6, 2018

@nodejs/documentation

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Apr 6, 2018

@nodejs/crypto

@@ -1232,6 +1244,9 @@ changes:
- `object` {string | Object}
- `signature` {string | Buffer | TypedArray | DataView}
- `signatureFormat` {string}
- Returns: {boolean} `true` or `false` depending on the validity of the
signature for the data and public key.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Spurious new line?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but I did not check if the added return types are correct.

doc/api/crypto.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Apr 8, 2018
@vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nodejs/crypto can somebody confirm that added return types are correct?

Copy link
Member

@tniessen tniessen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vsemozhetbyt I believe they are.


Returns the EC Diffie-Hellman public key in the specified `encoding` and
`format`.
- Returns: {Buffer | string} the EC Diffie-Hellman public key in the specified
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uppercase for consistency? {Buffer | string} The

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in the fixup commit.

@vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI-lite: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request-lite/453/
Will land soon if nobody objects.

vsemozhetbyt added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2018
Conform return statements to the style guide and tool parsers.

Also bring back a description fragment
that seems to be erroneously deleted in
1e07acd

PR-URL: #19853
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
@vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Landed in 0bd3da1

@vsemozhetbyt vsemozhetbyt deleted the doc-crypto-nits branch April 8, 2018 22:23
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2018
Conform return statements to the style guide and tool parsers.

Also bring back a description fragment
that seems to be erroneously deleted in
1e07acd

PR-URL: #19853
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request May 1, 2018
Conform return statements to the style guide and tool parsers.

Also bring back a description fragment
that seems to be erroneously deleted in
nodejs@1e07acd

PR-URL: nodejs#19853
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
trivikr pushed a commit to trivikr/node that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2018
Conform return statements to the style guide and tool parsers.

Also bring back a description fragment
that seems to be erroneously deleted in
nodejs@1e07acd

PR-URL: nodejs#19853
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2018
Conform return statements to the style guide and tool parsers.

Also bring back a description fragment
that seems to be erroneously deleted in
1e07acd

Backport-PR-URL: #22870
PR-URL: #19853
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants