Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: improve test-gc-http-client-connaborted #23193

Closed

Conversation

lundibundi
Copy link
Member

@lundibundi lundibundi commented Oct 1, 2018

  • refactor out usage of 'function' for scoping
  • wait till server is up to start firing requests
Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

This has been failing a lot recently so tried to make this less intensive, refactor a bit. With this, I was able to run this with '-j 32 --repeat 1920' in 'test/parallel' on 4 core (8 thread) i7.

@lundibundi lundibundi self-assigned this Oct 1, 2018
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Oct 1, 2018
@lundibundi lundibundi added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 2, 2018
@lundibundi
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, this test as failed on windows on CI. Even though this (IMO) is an improvement it's still not enough. I think we can land this anyway as it should at least decrease the rate at which we are getting failures.

@addaleax addaleax removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 4, 2018
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented Oct 4, 2018

decrease amount of requests 500 -> 300

I think that might help with masking a real problem, see nodejs/reliability#18 (comment).

* refactor out usage of 'function' for scoping
* wait till server is up to start firing requests
@lundibundi
Copy link
Member Author

@lundibundi lundibundi added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 8, 2018
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

Landed in 63a6352

@addaleax addaleax closed this Oct 12, 2018
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2018
* refactor out usage of 'function' for scoping
* wait till server is up to start firing requests

PR-URL: #23193
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Trott pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2018
* refactor out usage of 'function' for scoping
* wait till server is up to start firing requests

PR-URL: #23193
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2018
* refactor out usage of 'function' for scoping
* wait till server is up to start firing requests

PR-URL: #23193
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2018
* refactor out usage of 'function' for scoping
* wait till server is up to start firing requests

PR-URL: #23193
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
* refactor out usage of 'function' for scoping
* wait till server is up to start firing requests

PR-URL: #23193
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2018
* refactor out usage of 'function' for scoping
* wait till server is up to start firing requests

PR-URL: #23193
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
* refactor out usage of 'function' for scoping
* wait till server is up to start firing requests

PR-URL: #23193
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants