Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

benchmark: fix bench-mkdirp to use recursive option #23699

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ajafff
Copy link
Contributor

@ajafff ajafff commented Oct 16, 2018

The original PR didn't update the benchmark after renaming the option.

The original PR didn't update the benchmark after renaming the option.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added benchmark Issues and PRs related to the benchmark subsystem. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. labels Oct 16, 2018
@jasnell jasnell added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Oct 16, 2018
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Oct 16, 2018

Please 👍 to approve fast-track

@ajafff
Copy link
Contributor Author

ajafff commented Oct 17, 2018

CI failure looks unrelated to this change

@addaleax addaleax added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. and removed fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. labels Oct 24, 2018
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Oct 28, 2018

Landed in 6b170f7

@targos targos closed this Oct 28, 2018
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2018
The original PR didn't update the benchmark after renaming the option.

PR-URL: #23699
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2018
The original PR didn't update the benchmark after renaming the option.

PR-URL: #23699
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2018
The original PR didn't update the benchmark after renaming the option.

PR-URL: #23699
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2018
The original PR didn't update the benchmark after renaming the option.

PR-URL: #23699
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2018
The original PR didn't update the benchmark after renaming the option.

PR-URL: #23699
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
The original PR didn't update the benchmark after renaming the option.

PR-URL: #23699
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. benchmark Issues and PRs related to the benchmark subsystem. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants