Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: uv_tty_init returns EBADF on IBM i #32338

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

test: uv_tty_init returns EBADF on IBM i #32338

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dmabupt
Copy link
Contributor

@dmabupt dmabupt commented Mar 18, 2020

When TTY initialization failed, uv_tty_init returned EBADF on IBM i
PASE, rather than EINVAL

It resolves the test-ttywrap-invalid-fd test failure on IBM i --

python3 tools/test.py -J --mode=release -v test/parallel/test-ttywrap-invalid-fd.js 
# out/Release/node -p process.arch
# out/Release/node -p process.versions.openssl
# out/Release/node -p process.features.inspector
# out/Release/node -p process.versions.openssl
[00:00|%   0|+   0|-   0]: release test-ttywrap-invalid-fd# out/Release/node --expose-internals /git/node/test/parallel/test-ttywrap-invalid-fd.js
[00:01|% 100|+   1|-   0]: Done  

When TTY initialization failed, uv_tty_init returned EBADF on IBM i
PASE, rather than EINVAL
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Mar 18, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@richardlau richardlau added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 18, 2020
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

Last CI run looks ok: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/29937/ even though status on PR does not reflect that. Going to land.

mhdawson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2020
When TTY initialization failed, uv_tty_init returned EBADF on IBM i
PASE, rather than EINVAL

PR-URL: #32338
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

Landed in ee7e0ce

@mhdawson mhdawson closed this Mar 20, 2020
@dmabupt dmabupt deleted the ibmi_tty branch March 21, 2020 09:40
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2020
When TTY initialization failed, uv_tty_init returned EBADF on IBM i
PASE, rather than EINVAL

PR-URL: #32338
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2020
When TTY initialization failed, uv_tty_init returned EBADF on IBM i
PASE, rather than EINVAL

PR-URL: #32338
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2020
Since the PR libuv/libuv#2753
has been landed, we need to revert the code change in
PR #32338.

PR-URL: #33629
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
codebytere pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2020
Since the PR libuv/libuv#2753
has been landed, we need to revert the code change in
PR #32338.

PR-URL: #33629
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
codebytere pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2020
Since the PR libuv/libuv#2753
has been landed, we need to revert the code change in
PR #32338.

PR-URL: #33629
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
codebytere pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2020
Since the PR libuv/libuv#2753
has been landed, we need to revert the code change in
PR #32338.

PR-URL: #33629
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants