-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: provide additional context #36201
Conversation
@MylesBorins is this along the lines of what you had in mind? |
Ironically, the commit message has insufficient context. Maybe this?:
|
doc/guides/technical-values.md
Outdated
@@ -3,6 +3,18 @@ | |||
The project uses these technical values to establish priorities and guide | |||
collaboration. | |||
|
|||
These values are meant to reflect the shared values of the | |||
collaborators at the current point in time and will change | |||
and evolve. We hope they are useful to people new |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think either "will change" or "will evolve" is sufficient.
It would be helpful if the commit log / PR would contain more information about what the additional context is being added to :-) |
In the discussion of nodejs#35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@jasnell updated |
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins if you can take a look would be good to confirm the concern you had. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@mmarchini any chance you can review/approve since you were in the meeting were we discussed as well? |
Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Linters have passed, landing |
In the discussion of #35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Landed in 6d3775e |
In the discussion of nodejs#35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: nodejs#36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
In the discussion of #35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
In the discussion of #35323 it was suggested that we should add some additional context/clarification to the technical values documented for the project. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #36201 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
In the discussion of #35323
it was suggested that we should add some
additional context/clarification.
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson [email protected]
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes