Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: provide additional context #36201

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

mhdawson
Copy link
Member

In the discussion of #35323
it was suggested that we should add some
additional context/clarification.

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson [email protected]

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Nov 20, 2020
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@MylesBorins is this along the lines of what you had in mind?

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Nov 22, 2020

Ironically, the commit message has insufficient context. Maybe this?:

doc: add context for technical values

@@ -3,6 +3,18 @@
The project uses these technical values to establish priorities and guide
collaboration.

These values are meant to reflect the shared values of the
collaborators at the current point in time and will change
and evolve. We hope they are useful to people new
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think either "will change" or "will evolve" is sufficient.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Nov 25, 2020

It would be helpful if the commit log / PR would contain more information about what the additional context is being added to :-)

In the discussion of nodejs#35323
it was suggested that we should add some
additional context/clarification to the technical
values documented for the project.

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@jasnell updated

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@MylesBorins if you can take a look would be good to confirm the concern you had.

Copy link
Contributor

@MylesBorins MylesBorins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson commented Dec 2, 2020

@mmarchini any chance you can review/approve since you were in the meeting were we discussed as well?

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson commented Dec 7, 2020

Linters have passed, landing

mhdawson added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2020
In the discussion of #35323
it was suggested that we should add some
additional context/clarification to the technical
values documented for the project.

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>

PR-URL: #36201
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson commented Dec 7, 2020

Landed in 6d3775e

@mhdawson mhdawson closed this Dec 7, 2020
cjihrig pushed a commit to cjihrig/node that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2020
In the discussion of nodejs#35323
it was suggested that we should add some
additional context/clarification to the technical
values documented for the project.

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>

PR-URL: nodejs#36201
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
In the discussion of #35323
it was suggested that we should add some
additional context/clarification to the technical
values documented for the project.

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>

PR-URL: #36201
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2021
In the discussion of #35323
it was suggested that we should add some
additional context/clarification to the technical
values documented for the project.

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>

PR-URL: #36201
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request May 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants