Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

util: use Object.create(null) for dictionary object #3831

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

util: use Object.create(null) for dictionary object #3831

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

JungMinu
Copy link
Member

Fixes #3788
arrayToHash() needs to use Object.create(null) for its dictionary object.

Fixes #3788
`arrayToHash()` needs to use `Object.create(null)` for its dictionary object.
@thefourtheye thefourtheye added the util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module. label Nov 15, 2015
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Nov 16, 2015

Given the LGTM's in the prior PR, will get this landed.

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2015
Fixes #3788
`arrayToHash()` needs to use `Object.create(null)` for its dictionary object.

Refs: #3791
PR-URL: #3831
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Nov 16, 2015

Landed in 9d0396c

@jasnell jasnell closed this Nov 16, 2015
@evanlucas
Copy link
Contributor

This should probably be semver-major?

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Nov 16, 2015

@nodejs/ctc ... any thoughts on the semver-iness of this change?

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Nov 16, 2015

This is a grey area. I would consider it a bug fix, but technically someone could be depending on the brackets described in #3788.

@trevnorris
Copy link
Contributor

I'd say bug fix as well.

Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2015
Fixes #3788
`arrayToHash()` needs to use `Object.create(null)` for its dictionary object.

Refs: #3791
PR-URL: #3831
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
@rvagg rvagg mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2015
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Dec 17, 2015

Given the nature of the change and the possibility that this could break someone, I'm not going to pull this into v4 at all.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants