-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: remove "feature branch" jargon #8194
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In the context of the CONTRIBUTING.md document, there is no advantage to describing the branch as a "feature branch" and the term may be confusing. Just refer to it as a branch. Context for the curious: The phrase "feature branch" in CONTIRUBTING.md confused someone I was assisting today. It occured to me that the word "feature" doesn't add anything and can be confusing. ("I'm doing a bug fix so I don't need to create a feature branch, right?")
Click the 'Pull Request' button and fill out the form. | ||
|
||
Pull requests are usually reviewed within a few days. If there are comments | ||
to address, apply your changes in a separate commit and push that to your | ||
feature branch. Post a comment in the pull request afterwards; GitHub does | ||
branch. Post a comment in the pull request afterwards; GitHub does | ||
not send out notifications when you add commits. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should reword this part now that GitHub does send notifications about new commits. That can be done in another PR, I'm just thinking out loud.
LGTM |
4 similar comments
LGTM |
LGTM |
LGTM |
LGTM |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2016
In the context of the CONTRIBUTING.md document, there is no advantage to describing the branch as a "feature branch" and the term may be confusing. Just refer to it as a branch. Context for the curious: The phrase "feature branch" in CONTIRUBTING.md confused someone I was assisting today. It occured to me that the word "feature" doesn't add anything and can be confusing. ("I'm doing a bug fix so I don't need to create a feature branch, right?") PR-URL: #8194 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Landed in d6d3229 |
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2016
In the context of the CONTRIBUTING.md document, there is no advantage to describing the branch as a "feature branch" and the term may be confusing. Just refer to it as a branch. Context for the curious: The phrase "feature branch" in CONTIRUBTING.md confused someone I was assisting today. It occured to me that the word "feature" doesn't add anything and can be confusing. ("I'm doing a bug fix so I don't need to create a feature branch, right?") PR-URL: #8194 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2016
In the context of the CONTRIBUTING.md document, there is no advantage to describing the branch as a "feature branch" and the term may be confusing. Just refer to it as a branch. Context for the curious: The phrase "feature branch" in CONTIRUBTING.md confused someone I was assisting today. It occured to me that the word "feature" doesn't add anything and can be confusing. ("I'm doing a bug fix so I don't need to create a feature branch, right?") PR-URL: #8194 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2016
In the context of the CONTRIBUTING.md document, there is no advantage to describing the branch as a "feature branch" and the term may be confusing. Just refer to it as a branch. Context for the curious: The phrase "feature branch" in CONTIRUBTING.md confused someone I was assisting today. It occured to me that the word "feature" doesn't add anything and can be confusing. ("I'm doing a bug fix so I don't need to create a feature branch, right?") PR-URL: #8194 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2016
In the context of the CONTRIBUTING.md document, there is no advantage to describing the branch as a "feature branch" and the term may be confusing. Just refer to it as a branch. Context for the curious: The phrase "feature branch" in CONTIRUBTING.md confused someone I was assisting today. It occured to me that the word "feature" doesn't add anything and can be confusing. ("I'm doing a bug fix so I don't need to create a feature branch, right?") PR-URL: #8194 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2016
In the context of the CONTRIBUTING.md document, there is no advantage to describing the branch as a "feature branch" and the term may be confusing. Just refer to it as a branch. Context for the curious: The phrase "feature branch" in CONTIRUBTING.md confused someone I was assisting today. It occured to me that the word "feature" doesn't add anything and can be confusing. ("I'm doing a bug fix so I don't need to create a feature branch, right?") PR-URL: #8194 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
doc
Description of change
In the context of the CONTRIBUTING.md document, there is no advantage to
describing the branch as a "feature branch" and the term may be
confusing. Just refer to it as a branch.
Context for the curious: The phrase "feature branch" in CONTIRUBTING.md
confused someone I was assisting today. It occured to me that the word
"feature" doesn't add anything and can be confusing. ("I'm doing a bug
fix so I don't need to create a feature branch, right?")
/cc @thecoolestguy