src: pull AfterConnect from pipe_wrap and tcp_wrap #8448
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit attempts to address one of the items in nodejs#4641 which is related to src/pipe_wrap.cc and src/tcp_wrap.cc. Currently both pipe_wrap.cc and tcp_wrap.cc contain an AfterConnect function that are almost identical. This commit extracts this function into ConnectionWrap so that that both can share it.
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
c++
| } else { | ||
| readable = uv_is_readable(req->handle) != 0; | ||
| writable = uv_is_writable(req->handle) != 0; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm uncertain if this is alright for TCPWrap or not (TCPWrap always set these arguments to true) and wanted to open the PR to get some feedback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It should be alright. The TCP sockets that libuv creates are always readable+writable.
|
LGTM |
|
CI failure looks infra related and unrelated to this change. |
|
LGTM |
2 similar comments
|
LGTM |
|
LGTM |
danbev
added a commit
to danbev/node
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 11, 2016
This commit attempts to address one of the items in nodejs#4641 which is related to src/pipe_wrap.cc and src/tcp_wrap.cc. Currently both pipe_wrap.cc and tcp_wrap.cc contain an AfterConnect function that are almost identical. This commit extracts this function into ConnectionWrap so that that both can share it. PR-URL: nodejs#8448 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
|
Thanks for the reviews! Landed in 83a354c |
Fishrock123
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2016
This commit attempts to address one of the items in #4641 which is related to src/pipe_wrap.cc and src/tcp_wrap.cc. Currently both pipe_wrap.cc and tcp_wrap.cc contain an AfterConnect function that are almost identical. This commit extracts this function into ConnectionWrap so that that both can share it. PR-URL: #8448 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
|
should this be backported to v4? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
src
Description of change
This commit attempts to address one of the items in
#4641 which is related to
src/pipe_wrap.cc and src/tcp_wrap.cc.
Currently both pipe_wrap.cc and tcp_wrap.cc contain an AfterConnect
function that are almost identical. This commit extracts this function
into ConnectionWrap so that that both can share it.