Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link to the old nodejs.org repo in readme #539

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2016
Merged

Conversation

phillipj
Copy link
Member

Added link to the old repo for nodejs.org in the readme, there are occasions where going through that repo for old are needed - e.g. for old blog articles and URLs.

And lets see if we're lucky enough to get a newly born bot commenting here.. fingers crossed

Added link to the old repo for `nodejs.org` in the readme, there are occasions where going through that repo for old are needed - e.g. for old blog articles and URLs.
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 25, 2016

Travis build passed 👍

stevemao added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2016
Link to the old nodejs.org repo in readme
@stevemao stevemao merged commit bb07316 into master Feb 25, 2016
@stevemao stevemao deleted the old-nodejs.org-link branch February 25, 2016 22:49
@stevemao
Copy link
Contributor

@phillipj Why do we use a bot instead of a hook (PR checks)?

@phillipj
Copy link
Member Author

@stevemao the short answers is we can't due to strict security policy in the organization. The long story are described in #355

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Feb 26, 2016

We can use hooks at the repo level just fine, it's org wide hooks that are the problem. We can allow org wide reads because we have security info and secrets in a few private repos.

@phillipj
Copy link
Member Author

@mikeal Travis supposedly requires org wide access #355 (comment). If you know any a way around it, please let me know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants