nip-29: human-readable, url friendly group names.

[kehiy]

Here is a better, and known way to identify groups for NIP-29 while sharing both group id and host.

Also, the current model: host'id, is not URL friendly.

[fiatjaf]

If we were to do that it would be better to use it for readable names instead of the canonical group ids, which are meant to be random.

[kehiy]

@fiatjaf Yes, got it. By id, here I mean a readable name of course. Should I add it to the spec?

[kehiy]

@fiatjaf @water783 I've updated the spec. please check. I used NIP-05 this time to point to group id, which is not human-readable and random generated string, but the name itself is human-readable. I've added the detail on how clients can find out how to behave when they see a nip-05 address. but if you think it's not logical we can use another similar thing. this is URL-friendly, easy to share, and human-readable now.

[water783]

Perhaps we can add kind 9009, and authorized admins can request a unique name(human-readable)?

[kehiy]

@water783 you mean admins request human-readable names from relays? it can work as well. and it's a good idea. then we don't need to resolve them like nip-05.