Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Can't find IsIterableContainingInAnyOrder matcher #14

Open
dkandalov opened this issue Oct 16, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Can't find IsIterableContainingInAnyOrder matcher #14

dkandalov opened this issue Oct 16, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement help wanted

Comments

@dkandalov
Copy link

dkandalov commented Oct 16, 2016 •
edited
Loading

If I am missing something, what is the idiomatic way to do it HamKrest?
Otherwise, are there any plans to implement this (are pull requests welcome)?
@npryce
Copy link
Owner

npryce commented Oct 16, 2016 •
edited
Loading

It's not implemented yet. In HamKrest, I'd call it containsAll to match contains.

PRs are welcome.

@dkandalov
Copy link
Author

I raised this PR #15 (but forgot to reference issue in commit name).

@corbym
Copy link

corbym commented Nov 11, 2020 •
edited
Loading

containsInAnyOrder is entirely different from contains or containsAll for lists (as mentioned in #37) - So I would suggest calling it containsInAnyOrder as per hamcrest.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement help wanted
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@dkandalov @npryce @corbym