Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use updated Service trait for ntex #456

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

Use updated Service trait for ntex #456

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

fafhrd91
Copy link
Member

@fafhrd91 fafhrd91 commented Nov 4, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.71429% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.00%. Comparing base (30115bf) to head (d861ed7).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ntex/src/http/client/connector.rs 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
ntex/src/http/h1/service.rs 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
ntex/src/http/service.rs 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
ntex/src/http/client/pool.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
ntex/src/http/h2/service.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
ntex/src/web/app_service.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
ntex/src/web/scope.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
ntex/src/web/test.rs 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #456      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.03%   91.00%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         200      198       -2     
  Lines       32474    32441      -33     
==========================================
- Hits        29563    29522      -41     
- Misses       2911     2919       +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fafhrd91 fafhrd91 merged commit c26b336 into master Nov 4, 2024
20 of 22 checks passed
@fafhrd91 fafhrd91 deleted the ntex-service-trait branch November 4, 2024 09:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant