Add LoL: Wild Rift detection

[0xA50C1A1]

Please sign (check) the below before submitting the Pull Request:

• I have signed the ntop Contributor License Agreement at https://github.com/ntop/legal/blob/main/individual-contributor-licence-agreement.md
• I have read the contributing guide lines at https://github.com/ntop/nDPI/blob/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md
• I have updated the documentation (in doc/) to reflect the changes made (if applicable)

Describe changes:

Regarding the detection logic: a UDP session is establishing with the game match start, and the first two packets in this session always have payload lengths of 69 and 359 bytes and contain signatures 0x4000000 (request) and 0x10000000 (response).

[0xA50C1A1]

../include/ndpi_typedefs.h:1504:1: error: static assertion failed: "Size of the flow struct increased to more than 1008 bytes, please check if this change is necessary."

@IvanNardi @utoni

Hmmm... Maybe it's somehow possible to add this stuff to the existing Riot Games dissector to avoid creating a new protocol ID.

Btw, here's a pcap sample with the traffic of the entire match if you're interested: lol_wild_rift.zip

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[IvanNardi]

../include/ndpi_typedefs.h:1504:1: error: static assertion failed: "Size of the flow struct increased to more than 1008 bytes, please check if this change is necessary."

@IvanNardi @utoni

Hmmm... Maybe it's somehow possible to add this stuff to the existing Riot Games dissector to avoid creating a new protocol ID.

Btw, here's a pcap sample with the traffic of the entire match if you're interested: lol_wild_rift.zip

Sooner or later we need to decide if there is any value in having one protocol id for each games, or if we might switch to something different... (one id for all the games + metadata with specific game indication? one specific id for each "sw house/company"? specific ids only for the most "famous" games?...)

[0xA50C1A1]

Sooner or later we need to decide if there is any value in having one protocol id for each games, or if we might switch to something different... (one id for all the games + metadata with specific game indication? one specific id for each "sw house/company"? specific ids only for the most "famous" games?...)

Well, many games use either out-of-the-box stuff like RakNet or Steam Datagram Relay or some generic protocols (NetEase Games, Gaijin Entertainment, Tencent Games) for all games from a publisher/developer, so I don't see a problem with leaving a few IDs for something that stands out.