Skip to content

feat: vim help docs #83

feat: vim help docs

feat: vim help docs #83

---
name: Review Checklist
on:
pull_request_target:
types: [opened, review_requested]
concurrency:
group: ${{ github.ref }}
cancel-in-progress: false
jobs:
review-checklist:
name: Review Checklist
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const body = context.payload.pull_request.body
if (body && body.startsWith(":robot: I have created a release *beep* *boop*")) { return; }
// Get a list of all issues created by the PR opener
// See: https://octokit.github.io/rest.js/#pagination
const creator = context.payload.sender.login
const opts = github.rest.issues.listForRepo.endpoint.merge({
...context.issue,
creator,
state: 'all'
})
const issues = await github.paginate(opts)
for (const issue of issues) {
if (issue.number === context.issue.number) {
continue
}
if (issue.pull_request) {
return // Creator is already a contributor.
}
}
const { data: comments } = await github.rest.issues.listComments({
issue_number: context.issue.number,
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
});
// if comment already exists, then just return
if (comments.find(comment => comment.body.includes("### Review Checklist"))) { return; }
github.rest.issues.createComment({
issue_number: context.issue.number,
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
body: `### Review Checklist
Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/nvim-neorocks/rocks.nvim/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)? Following is a _partial_ checklist:
Proper [conventional commit](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) scoping:
- For example, fix(installer): some installer bugfix
- [ ] Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit prefix.
If applicable:
- [ ] Tested
- [ ] Tests have been added.
- [ ] Tested manually (steps in PR description).
- [ ] Updated documentation.
`,
})